|Don Flinn||May 29, 2005 11:57 am|
|McGr...@tbs-sct.gc.ca||May 30, 2005 10:41 am|
|Don Flinn||May 30, 2005 1:11 pm|
|Peter F Brown||May 30, 2005 4:08 pm|
|John Harby||Jun 2, 2005 6:04 am|
|Don Flinn||Jun 2, 2005 6:25 am|
|John Harby||Jun 4, 2005 6:37 pm||.doc|
|Don Flinn||Jun 5, 2005 8:36 am|
|Don Flinn||Jun 8, 2005 8:05 am|
|Duane Nickull||Jun 8, 2005 8:13 am|
|Don Flinn||Jun 8, 2005 8:30 am|
|Francis McCabe||Jun 8, 2005 8:44 am|
|McGr...@tbs-sct.gc.ca||Jun 8, 2005 8:55 am|
|John Harby||Jun 8, 2005 8:57 am|
|Duane Nickull||Jun 8, 2005 9:36 am|
|Don Flinn||Jun 8, 2005 10:14 am|
|Duane Nickull||Jun 8, 2005 10:18 am|
|McGr...@tbs-sct.gc.ca||Jun 8, 2005 12:01 pm|
|Subject:||Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions|
|From:||Duane Nickull (dnic...@adobe.com)|
|Date:||Jun 8, 2005 9:36:07 am|
He is not on vacation and if he (or any other commenter) does not respond by CoB today, I would recommend simply replying to the comment with
"Additional clarification was requested; no response received. Comment tabled"
Unless there is a clear way to address it without the clarification. To be fair, perhaps you could ping him today with this information to ensure he is aware that unless he provides the input the comment is subject to slip.
He is always free to re-submit the comments in the next round.
In time for the next conference call, I would like to suggest that we compose a list of comment dispositions to work through as a TC and allow people in advance to look at this. perhaps we can get a new draft done very soon.
Also - what is the proposed disposition of Gregory's comment regarding figure 2-1 being too vacuous? IMO - this precedes all other dispositions since it impacts them.
I also posed some questions to Joe.
He must be on vacation.
-----Original Message----- From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fg...@fla.fujitsu.com] Sent: June 8, 2005 11:44 AM To: Don Flinn Cc: soa-rm-editors Subject: Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions
I thought that the process involved first of all discussing the issue with the raiser of the issue.
I have not submitted my dispositions because I have not had any response yet from Joe. Frank
On Jun 8, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Don Flinn wrote:
Hi Fellow Editors
So far I have received Proposed Dispositions (PDs) from Peter Brown, John Harby and Don Flinn. I'm looking for an onslaught of PDs today as this is our target date.
If your PD is short (reasonable size for a Excel cell) send it with the issue number. If the PD is lengthy upload an email containing the PD to Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page. I will then put a hyperlink to your email in the appropriate PD cell. Include the issue number in the email. See John Harby's PD in the Draft 07 folder for an example.
If you have any question or problems please contact me.