5 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] jam2.5 & TOP?
FromSent OnAttachments
Craig Allsop20 Jan 2003 14:38 
Matt Armstrong20 Jan 2003 20:04 
Christopher Seiwald24 Jan 2003 14:08 
Craig Allsop28 Jan 2003 00:26 
Matt Armstrong28 Jan 2003 08:24 
Subject:[jamming] jam2.5 & TOP?
From:Matt Armstrong (ma@lickey.com)
Date:01/20/2003 08:04:35 PM
List:com.perforce.jamming

"Craig Allsop" <call@sceptre.net> writes:

Hi guys.

In Jam 2.5rc1 (OS=NT). If TOP is set, then jam does not include jamrules. Is this the intention?

This is the behavior I see too. It looks like setting TOP explicitly is now broken -- or at least Jamrules will no longer be included if this is the case. The "offending" p4 change that introduce this problem is:

Change 2480 by rmg@rmg:pdjam:chinacat on 2002/12/15 11:53:12

Rewrite jam's SubDir rule to allow multiple roots.

Infrastructure change.

=== computer:1666: Change 33320 by seiwald@thin on 2002/05/13 10:10:50