On 7/13/06, Gary VanMatre <gvan...@comcast.net> wrote:
Yea, that's what I meant. Do you think we need a dtds and schema folders under the shale site, or just a dtds folder. With the DTD's loaded from the classpath we might not even need to publish them on the web site.
Infrastructure would probably be happy if we didn't publish them on
the website. :) But it is convenient when JEdit just grabs the DTD
and starts complaining if the document doesn't validate.
I have one XSD that I could publish for clay html namespace support. In the future, we might have a couple more for Clay's version of the core and html schema. The clay markup parser is not validating so these would only be needed for tool support.