atom feed17 messages in org.apache.shale.devRe: Shale namespace changes
FromSent OnAttachments
Gary VanMatreJul 13, 2006 12:25 pm 
James HolmesJul 13, 2006 12:28 pm 
James MitchellJul 13, 2006 12:29 pm 
Matthias WessendorfJul 13, 2006 12:30 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 13, 2006 12:38 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 13, 2006 12:58 pm 
James MitchellJul 13, 2006 1:40 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 13, 2006 2:04 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 13, 2006 3:19 pm 
James MitchellJul 13, 2006 3:24 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 13, 2006 3:29 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 13, 2006 4:04 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 13, 2006 4:15 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 13, 2006 8:53 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 13, 2006 8:54 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 13, 2006 9:49 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 14, 2006 8:30 am 
Subject:Re: Shale namespace changes
From:Wendy Smoak (wsm@gmail.com)
Date:Jul 13, 2006 2:04:11 pm
List:org.apache.shale.dev

On 7/13/06, Gary VanMatre <gvan@comcast.net> wrote:

Yea, that's what I meant. Do you think we need a dtds and schema folders under
the shale site, or just a dtds folder. With the DTD's loaded from the classpath
we might not even need to publish them on the web site.

shale.apache.org/dtds

Infrastructure would probably be happy if we didn't publish them on the website. :) But it is convenient when JEdit just grabs the DTD and starts complaining if the document doesn't validate.

I have one XSD that I could publish for clay html namespace support. In the
future, we might have a couple more for Clay's version of the core and html
schema. The clay markup parser is not validating so these would only be needed
for tool support.

Is there a 'standard' location for schemas? Sun uses http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd .

Maybe shale.apache.org/xml/ ?