16 messages in edu.merit.nanogRe: impossible circuit
FromSent OnAttachments
Jon LewisAug 10, 2008 8:15 pm 
George CareyAug 10, 2008 10:24 pm 
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.Aug 11, 2008 6:27 am 
Justin ShoreAug 11, 2008 1:16 pm 
Jay R. AshworthAug 11, 2008 1:22 pm 
list...@pwns.msAug 12, 2008 4:36 am 
Jon LewisAug 12, 2008 7:37 am 
Andy JohnsonAug 13, 2008 7:41 am 
Justin ShoreAug 13, 2008 9:02 am 
Jon LewisAug 13, 2008 9:29 am 
Andy JohnsonAug 13, 2008 11:27 am 
Jared MauchAug 13, 2008 11:33 am 
Jon LewisAug 16, 2008 11:07 pm 
list...@pwns.msAug 16, 2008 11:36 pm 
Jay HenniganAug 16, 2008 11:56 pm 
Paul WallAug 18, 2008 1:46 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: impossible circuitActions...
From:Jay Hennigan (ja@west.net)
Date:Aug 16, 2008 11:56:43 pm
List:edu.merit.nanog

Is this only happening in one direction? One possibility is that the carrier has a different circuit that is provisioned up, HDLC, with no physical connection. A short-circuit in a DACS or MUX is bridging the transmit interface towards your destination with a transmit interface on the unused but active circuit. This would cause your traffic in that direction to fork both on the desired path and some rogue path that eventually gets routed to your destination.

The ethernet equivalent would be a SPAN monitor port plumbed to a transmit-only interface on a different network.

Definitely a strange one. If I'm correct, when the other circuit starts to get customer traffic things will probably break completely for either the new customer seeing your PPP traffic or for both of you.