9 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] fetchmail + maildrop = ?
FromSent OnAttachments
Eric d'AlibutJun 6, 2007 12:41 pm 
Jeronimo ZuccoJun 6, 2007 12:45 pm 
Eric d'AlibutJun 6, 2007 12:55 pm 
Matthias AndreeJun 7, 2007 9:04 am 
Eric d'AlibutJun 7, 2007 11:19 am 
Sam VarshavchikJun 7, 2007 3:25 pm 
Eric d'AlibutJun 7, 2007 10:33 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJun 8, 2007 4:02 am 
Eric d'AlibutJun 8, 2007 10:19 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] fetchmail + maildrop = ?Actions...
From:Eric d'Alibut (eric@gmail.com)
Date:Jun 8, 2007 10:19:37 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

On 6/8/07, Sam Varshavchik <mrs@courier-mta.com> wrote:

Is there a 'best practice' approach to quoting vars in such a situation?

That's the best practice: understand how quoting and shell expansion works. Recognize that all variables get exported into the shell's environment, and let the shell do environment substitution.

Rightly or wrongly, I have gained the impression over the years that understanding Unified Field Theory is closer to hand than understanding the shell's ways of handling variables. But I asked the question and now I have my answer. <g>

Thanks,

--==++ http://2idi.com/contact/=bob.bernstein ++==--