11 messages in com.googlegroups.google-mashup-editorRe: Search on ${app} and ${user}| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rohit Ghatol | 11 Sep 2007 18:56 | |
| Jason | 14 Sep 2007 18:09 | |
| Rohit Ghatol | 16 Sep 2007 21:01 | |
| Jason | 18 Sep 2007 10:14 | |
| Rohit Ghatol | 20 Sep 2007 02:47 | |
| Jason | 20 Sep 2007 18:18 | |
| Rohit Ghatol | 21 Sep 2007 03:12 | |
| Jason | 21 Sep 2007 18:21 | |
| Rohit Ghatol | 23 Sep 2007 10:15 | |
| Jason | 24 Sep 2007 16:35 | |
| Jason | 26 Sep 2007 10:09 |
| Subject: | Re: Search on ${app} and ${user} |
|---|---|
| From: | Jason (gmej...@google.com) |
| Date: | 09/26/2007 10:09:56 AM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.google-mashup-editor |
Answers inline.
Good point! :) . Nevertheless, I am a little not-yet-completely-sold to the idea of having to tell the users...."We have added your entry, and it will be available to the other users soon." But then that is behavioral change. I'll manage, as long as you keep doing the good work on the new APIs front. :)
I can't give you too much more information on this front, but we're working on it. :)
Would it be too difficult to do a ${appannotations} though? Write access only to those who have write access to ${app}.Actually it might as well be $app/annotations for that matter. That way the members could write offline batch scripts to periodically update their annotations based on annotations on users public feeds. But I am assuming that a users annotations are public if their $user feed is public.
I'll certainly file a feature request for this, as I agree that an application-wide annotation feature would be great to have. Thanks for the suggestion!
Gee... I didn't quiet get this bit.
I'm sorry for the confused wording above. I meant that it is possible to create a feed hierarchy where each entry in one feed has another feed associated with it (much like the Task List sample where each project entry as a separate tasks feed associated with it). Using this technique, you could associate a list of tags with a single entry, and this list would be viewable to all users. The drawback is that you could not "filter" by tag/label as you could if you were using annotations/labels directly. Hope this helps
- Jason