atom feed11 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.uddi-promo-discussRE: [uddi-promo-discuss] Promotion of...
FromSent OnAttachments
dave...@bt.comFeb 13, 2004 2:36 am 
Paul M O'pellaFeb 13, 2004 5:41 am 
dave...@bt.comFeb 13, 2004 8:06 am 
James GovernorFeb 13, 2004 8:20 am 
dave...@bt.comFeb 13, 2004 8:40 am 
George ZagelowFeb 13, 2004 8:53 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 8 more
Young, Brian RFeb 13, 2004 9:12 am 
James GovernorFeb 13, 2004 9:30 am 
George ZagelowFeb 13, 2004 9:32 am 
Bobbin TeegardenFeb 13, 2004 10:56 am 
Anne Thomas ManesFeb 13, 2004 12:34 pm 
Subject:RE: [uddi-promo-discuss] Promotion of UDDI
From:George Zagelow (zage@us.ibm.com)
Date:Feb 13, 2004 9:32:41 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.uddi-promo-discuss

This is a circular issue. There are quite a few V2 implementations, in high profile products. But with usage primarily internal to user shops, it's hard to gauge the actual pervasiveness of usage. So it's hard to know the strength of the requirement for V3. From a technology supplier perspective, we need to hear that users need the V3 function. That helps us cement V3 into the product plans. That said, I believe there are a number of vendors readying V3 releases.

Regards, George

Chair, OASIS UDDI Member Section Steering Committee Managing Director, UDDI Operators Council Web Services Strategy, IBM Software Group 1-408-463-4041 or 543-4041, FAX 3319 zage@us.ibm.com

To: <uddi@lists.oasis-open.org> cc: Subject: RE: [uddi-promo-discuss] Promotion of UDDI

Hi, I think we need something on Vendor committment / support also. UDDI V 3 Implementations seem very slow to appear. Vendors seem to have gone a little quiet on UDDI in the past year, which is probably why the take up by their customers is not really happening. As one of my colleagues just said, it is as if vendors have implemented it to get a 'tick in the box', but aren't really interested. Dave Prout Web Services Integration Technical Architecture BT

-----Original Message----- From: Paul M O'pella [mailto:pope@us.ibm.com] Sent: 13 February 2004 13:53 To: George Zagelow; uddi@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [uddi-promo-discuss] Promotion of UDDI

I haven't seen any either, but thanks for the reminder to reply. If possible, I would like to see us try to cover the first three of George's suggestions at least initially, perhaps focusing on one or two depending on our success and the response:

* UDDI User Experiences * UDDI Best Practices * UDDI User Education

I believe publishing useful information about any or all of these three will automatically accomplish * UDDI promotion / evangelism

I think George's last item will be so much a part of these three as to preclude the need for it's being explicit * Usage of UDDI as a component of Web Services

I would add

* Usage of UDDI Internal Registries to facilitate reuse Regards, Paul "There is more to life than increasing its speed." -- Mahatma Gandhi Paul M. O'Pella IBM Certified Consulting I/T Architect Global Services / EAI Certified MQSeries Specialist / Solutions Expert, MQSI Specialist, CrossWorlds Solutions Expert:, e-business Solutions Technologist pope@us.ibm.com

<dave@bt.co m> To 02/13/2004 05:48 George Zagelow/Santa AM Teresa/IBM@IBMUS,

<uddi-promo-discuss@lists.oasis-ope n.org>

cc Subject RE: [uddi-promo-discuss] Promotion of UDDI

I haven't seen any other messages since George's. Have I missed any ?

Dave Prout Web Services Integration Technical Architecture

BT

+44 1442 296778

-----Original Message----- From: George Zagelow [mailto:zage@us.ibm.com] Sent: 04 February 2004 00:36 To: uddi@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [uddi-promo-discuss] Promotion of UDDI

Greetings to the subscribers to our new discussion list. Let begin by welcoming you to the list, and by providing some background. When UDDI.org brought the early UDDI specifications to OASIS, we were looking for a flexible way to manage the further development of the spec. The OASIS Member Section structure was ideal, as it mapped very closely to the UDDI.org management structure we had in place, and gave us great flexibility in terms of managing as many different work efforts as we might need. The Member Section Steering Committee is now proposing that we do more to leverage the structure and to expand the family of those who have an interest in the success of UDDI. The Spec TC has done a superb job in progressing the spec. But, having a good spec isn't of much value if people don't know about it, or know how to use the technology. To that end, we are hopeful that this discussion list will allow us to zero in on at least one area of common interest, where we can start up a TC to work on some aspect of promoting UDDI. I gave some examples of areas we have discussed at the Steering Committee in the discussion list description:

* UDDI User Experiences * UDDI Best Practices * UDDI User Education * UDDI promotion / evangelism * Usage of UDDI as a component of Web Services

Some of this is pretty easy - pointers to exisiting customer references, or keeping current UDDI product descriptions out on UDDI.org. But, we could also go for a TC specifically focused on what users need. And, invite users to participate directly. We've purposely left the scope very broad, to see where we might get common interest. We'd be delighted to hear your thoughts, or answer any questions you might have. Thanks much.

Regards, George Chair, OASIS UDDI Member Section Steering Committee Managing Director, UDDI Operators Council Web Services Strategy, IBM Software Group 1-408-463-4041 or 543-4041, FAX 3319 zage@us.ibm.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: uddi@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: uddi@lists.oasis-open.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: uddi@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: uddi@lists.oasis-open.org