31 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Deferred packets on 2950 10/f...
FromSent OnAttachments
Clinton WorkJan 14, 2005 5:25 pm 
jex...@harding.eduJan 14, 2005 5:36 pm 
Larry SmithJan 14, 2005 5:45 pm 
John NeibergerJan 14, 2005 5:53 pm 
Michael K. SmithJan 14, 2005 5:55 pm 
Niels BakkerJan 14, 2005 7:35 pm 
Anthony D CennamiJan 14, 2005 8:19 pm 
Greg SchwimerJan 14, 2005 9:16 pm 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 3:03 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 15, 2005 3:55 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 4:05 am 
Chris CappuccioJan 15, 2005 4:11 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 4:16 am 
lee....@census.govJan 15, 2005 7:23 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 8:14 am 
MikeJan 15, 2005 9:25 am 
Church, ChuckJan 15, 2005 9:47 am 
Gert DoeringJan 15, 2005 11:20 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 15, 2005 11:31 am 
Gert DoeringJan 15, 2005 11:57 am 
Michael K. SmithJan 15, 2005 4:25 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 15, 2005 4:45 pm 
Michael K. SmithJan 15, 2005 4:48 pm 
Michael K. SmithJan 15, 2005 4:52 pm 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 16, 2005 2:33 am 
Majid FaridJan 16, 2005 2:42 am 
Reuben FarrellyJan 16, 2005 5:35 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 16, 2005 5:49 am 
Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBNJan 18, 2005 10:26 am 
Vincent De KeyzerJan 18, 2005 10:40 am 
Clinton WorkJan 19, 2005 11:48 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] Deferred packets on 2950 10/full interfaceActions...
From:Reuben Farrelly (reub@reub.net)
Date:Jan 16, 2005 5:35:18 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Hi Mikael,

At 09:03 p.m. 15/01/2005, you wrote:

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Niels Bakker wrote:

This sounds completely crazy. Can you name vendors whose equipment performs according to this atrocity?

On Sun:s 100meg ethernet interfaces you can enable or disable "capabilities". If you disable the machines capability to choose 10/h, 10/f and 100/h, it'll only do 100/full, but still announce via autoneg that it does so and thus if the other end runs autoneg, it'll autoneg to 100/f.

Working at an ISP, I would LOVE for cisco to implement this (I have a feature request in for this as of a year ago), because it would save us a ton of operational problems with customers that force 100/full when we have autoneg, and the other way around. I see no reason to stop negotiating/announcing what you're set to, just because it's set to a specific value?

Already implemented, on the 4500 platform in <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps4324/products_configuration_guide_book09186a008027d1e6.html>12.2(20)EWA .

From http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps4324/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00802c30f6.html#wp1047376:

Setting the Interface Speed

If you set the interface speed to auto on a 10/100-Mbps Ethernet interface, speed and duplex are autonegotiated. The forced 10/100 autonegotiation feature allows you to limit interface speed auto negotiation up to 100 Mbps on a 10/100/1000BASE-T port.

etc

Also on the 3750:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps5023/prod_bulletin0900aecd80122f85.html

I expect that in time it will appear on nearly all current switching platforms...

Reuben