87 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] cisco 1721 & load sharing acr...
FromSent OnAttachments
Vincent De KeyzerNov 19, 2004 6:46 am 
Gert DoeringNov 19, 2004 9:01 am 
David J. HughesNov 21, 2004 5:15 pm 
Ryan O'ConnellNov 21, 2004 5:43 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 21, 2004 9:16 pm 
Jon LewisNov 21, 2004 9:49 pm 
Gert DoeringNov 22, 2004 2:55 am 
Ian DickinsonNov 22, 2004 4:11 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 22, 2004 4:52 am 
Ian DickinsonNov 22, 2004 5:47 am 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 6:45 am 
Gert DoeringNov 22, 2004 7:36 am 
Rainer BorromeoNov 22, 2004 8:39 am 
Jared MauchNov 22, 2004 10:19 am 
Gert DoeringNov 22, 2004 11:07 am 
Łukasz BromirskiNov 22, 2004 11:15 am 
Brian FeenyNov 22, 2004 12:04 pm 
Gunther StammwitzNov 22, 2004 1:51 pm 
Jared MauchNov 22, 2004 2:03 pm 
Michael LyngbølNov 22, 2004 2:15 pm 
Gunther StammwitzNov 22, 2004 2:19 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 2:44 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 22, 2004 4:48 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 4:53 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 22, 2004 4:58 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 4:59 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 5:17 pm 
Randy BushNov 22, 2004 5:21 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 5:31 pm 
Randy BushNov 22, 2004 5:34 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 22, 2004 5:38 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 22, 2004 8:17 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 22, 2004 8:31 pm 
Michael LyngbølNov 23, 2004 2:44 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 5:10 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 5:10 am 
Gert DoeringNov 23, 2004 5:24 am 
Michael LyngbølNov 23, 2004 5:29 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 5:38 am 
Michael LyngbølNov 23, 2004 5:39 am 
Martin RobinsonNov 23, 2004 5:50 am 
Tantsura, JeffNov 23, 2004 5:51 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 6:42 am 
Ben CrockerNov 23, 2004 6:54 am 
ege iyiogluNov 23, 2004 9:28 am 
Tantsura, JeffNov 23, 2004 10:17 am 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 10:39 am 
Tantsura, JeffNov 23, 2004 11:12 am 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 11:38 am 
Brian FeenyNov 23, 2004 12:11 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 12:33 pm 
Gert DoeringNov 23, 2004 3:01 pm 
David J. HughesNov 23, 2004 4:42 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 7:33 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 23, 2004 7:37 pm 
David J. HughesNov 23, 2004 8:30 pm 
Mihai CHELARUNov 24, 2004 5:07 am 
Gert DoeringNov 24, 2004 7:27 am 
Rodney DunnNov 24, 2004 8:27 am 
David J. HughesNov 24, 2004 6:28 pm 
Krzysztof AdamskiNov 24, 2004 10:33 pm 
Robert BoyleNov 25, 2004 12:48 am 
Bill WichersNov 25, 2004 12:56 am 
Krzysztof AdamskiNov 25, 2004 9:44 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxNov 26, 2004 9:21 am 
Gert DoeringNov 26, 2004 10:03 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxNov 26, 2004 11:09 am 
Gert DoeringNov 26, 2004 11:20 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxNov 27, 2004 6:53 am 
Rodney DunnNov 30, 2004 6:40 pm 
David J. HughesNov 30, 2004 7:26 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 30, 2004 10:30 pm 
Randy BushDec 1, 2004 12:30 am 
David J. HughesDec 1, 2004 12:57 am 
lee....@census.govDec 1, 2004 8:59 am 
Rodney DunnDec 1, 2004 9:18 am 
lee....@census.govDec 1, 2004 11:18 am 
David J. HughesDec 1, 2004 8:40 pm 
Randy BushDec 1, 2004 8:51 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 27, 2005 11:41 am 
Gert DoeringJan 27, 2005 11:45 am 
Rodney DunnJan 27, 2005 11:48 am 
David J. HughesJan 27, 2005 11:42 pm 
Joe MaimonJan 28, 2005 8:28 am 
Jon LewisJan 28, 2005 9:25 am 
Joe MaimonJan 28, 2005 9:52 am 
Jon LewisJan 28, 2005 10:25 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] cisco 1721 & load sharing across unequal paths.Actions...
From:Rodney Dunn (rod@cisco.com)
Date:Nov 23, 2004 10:39:28 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Where are you suggesting he use EIGRP?

If he is using NAT to overload on the egress ISP interfaces the return traffic from the ISP's will come back to the correct link.

If he uses two static default routes you shouldn't need any floating routes. He wants them both up always as long as the path is there. If one goes away traffic would take the other path. I didn't interpret it to mean backup as in a "dial backup" scenario.

I do agree with you on the Object tracking part to detect when the ISP link is up or down.

The one problem here is that he will have a 1Mbps leased line and a 8Mbps wireless connection. With two static defaults the router doesn't know the difference and most likely you will overload the 1Mbps serial before getting close to the 8Mbps speed.

I think the most optimal solution here would be static routes with object tracking to make sure the ISP connections are up.

Then to get the load balancing proportional to the link speeds use OER. The only gotcha here that I'm not sure about is how OER interacts with NAT.

Rodney

On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 04:18:08PM +0100, Tantsura, Jeff wrote:

Hi,

You should definitely go for EIGRP as it supports unequal load sharing and VLSM. Second option would be 1 primary and 1 backup path with floating default - in this example wireless is the primary ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <next hop IP wireless> 100 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <next hop IP serial> 200

In this case you could also use Reliable Static Routing Backup Using Object Tracking http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5413/products_ feature_guide09186a00801d862d.html because if IP next hop is unreachable but ethernet link is UP backup wont kick in.

Hope this helps, Jeff

With kind regards/ met vriendelijke groeten,

-------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Tantsura CCIE #11416 Senior Consultant Capgemini Nederland BV Tel: +31(0)30 689 2866 Mob:+31(0)6 4588 6858 Fax: +31(0)30 689 6565

--------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message----- From: cisc@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisc@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ege iyioglu Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:15 PM To: cisc@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] cisco 1721 & load sharing across unequal paths.

Hi there We have a Cisco 1721 router with a serial interface and an ethernet interface.. You can find the run and ver info below. The serial interface is connected to an ISP through a 1mbit leased line connection. The ethernet interface is connected to the inside network. We do NAT. We'd like to add another ethernet interface and connect it to a wireless access point that will receive an 8mbit connection from another ISP. Both connections will provide access to the internet. We also would like to implement load sharing and redundancy between those 2 interfaces (the serial interface and the 2nd ethernet interface..) our router has 32 MB of ram. I'm planning to run IGRP or EIGRP with the maximum-paths 2 command. First of all, do you think this is a feasible scenario that would provide load sharing and redundancy? And if it is, would our router's cpu and memory be enough for all of this or do we need an upgrade? I'm open to suggestions since this is the first time I will be doing this.

Deep Regards Ege

------- sh run -------- Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1230 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname ##### ! logging buffered 16380 debugging no logging console enable password ##### ! username ##### callback-dialstring ##### password 0 ##### ip subnet-zero ! ! ! ! chat-script callback ABORT ERROR ABORT BUSY "" "ATDT\T" TIMEOUT 30 "CONNECT" \c modemcap entry usrmodem:MSC=&FS0=1&C1&D3&H1&R2&B1 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 212.58.x.x 255.255.255.240 speed auto ! interface Serial0 description ##### bandwidth 1024 ip address 212.2.x.x 255.255.255.252 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface Async5 ip address 192.168.x.x 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp async default routing async mode interactive ppp callback accept ppp authentication pap ! ip classless ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 script callback callback login local modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usrmodem transport input all autoselect during-login speed 300 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 password ##### login ! no scheduler allocate end

--------- sh ver -----------

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-SY-M), Version 12.2(8)YJ, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEAS E SOFTWARE (fc1) Synched to technology version 12.2(8.5)T TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 21-Jun-02 15:38 by ealyon Image text-base: 0x80008124, data-base: 0x80B64A38

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) ROM: C1700 Software (C1700-SY-M), Version 12.2(8)YJ, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SO FTWARE (fc1)

bilfenrtr uptime is 1 day, 2 hours, 31 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System restarted at 16:27:54 UTC Fri Nov 5 2004 System image file is "flash:c1700-sy-mz.122-8.YJ.bin"

cisco 1721 (MPC860P) processor (revision 0x100) with 29492K/3276K bytes of memor y. Processor board ID FOC06330050 (1457551649), with hardware revision 0000 MPC860P processor: part number 5, mask 2 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

Configuration register is 0x2102