75 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] PDDP meeting?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 18, 2006 4:34 pm | |
| Mark Polishook | Apr 18, 2006 6:23 pm | |
| dafydd hughes | Apr 18, 2006 9:33 pm | |
| Koray Tahiroglu | Apr 18, 2006 11:32 pm | |
| adam armfield | Apr 19, 2006 6:43 am | |
| derek holzer | Apr 19, 2006 8:07 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 19, 2006 4:20 pm | |
| David Powers | Apr 20, 2006 10:40 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 21, 2006 1:34 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 21, 2006 1:36 am | |
| adam | Apr 21, 2006 3:23 am | |
| adam | Apr 21, 2006 3:48 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Apr 21, 2006 4:49 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Apr 21, 2006 5:45 am | |
| Koray Tahiroglu | Apr 21, 2006 5:57 am | |
| B. Bogart | Apr 21, 2006 8:15 am | |
| dafydd hughes | Apr 21, 2006 8:24 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 22, 2006 11:04 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 22, 2006 11:06 am | |
| adam | Apr 23, 2006 10:13 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 25, 2006 9:06 am | |
| derek holzer | Apr 25, 2006 11:49 am | |
| David Powers | Apr 25, 2006 12:33 pm | |
| day 5 | Apr 25, 2006 12:39 pm | |
| João Miguel Pais | Apr 26, 2006 1:26 am |  .txt |
| adam | Apr 26, 2006 3:06 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 26, 2006 3:24 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 26, 2006 3:29 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 26, 2006 3:30 am | |
| David Powers | Apr 26, 2006 12:48 pm | |
| day 5 | Apr 26, 2006 1:53 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Apr 26, 2006 2:20 pm | |
| s.koepf | Apr 26, 2006 2:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Apr 28, 2006 4:13 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Apr 30, 2006 9:58 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Apr 30, 2006 10:26 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Apr 30, 2006 10:33 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Apr 30, 2006 10:39 am | |
| Chris McCormick | Apr 30, 2006 6:21 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 1, 2006 7:36 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 1, 2006 6:37 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 1, 2006 8:17 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 1, 2006 9:13 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 1, 2006 10:47 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 5, 2006 1:34 pm | |
| Arie van Schutterhoef | May 5, 2006 1:56 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 5, 2006 2:12 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | May 5, 2006 2:35 pm | |
| day 5 | May 5, 2006 4:55 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | May 6, 2006 1:18 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 6, 2006 5:56 am | |
| Arie van Schutterhoef | May 6, 2006 6:35 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 6, 2006 11:37 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 6, 2006 11:42 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 6, 2006 11:56 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 6, 2006 12:39 pm | |
| Arie van Schutterhoef | May 6, 2006 1:25 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | May 6, 2006 3:09 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 6, 2006 4:56 pm | |
| Arie van Schutterhoef | May 6, 2006 5:41 pm | |
| geiger | May 7, 2006 6:15 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 7, 2006 12:22 pm | |
| Arie van Schutterhoef | May 7, 2006 3:14 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 7, 2006 6:24 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 7, 2006 6:51 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 7, 2006 8:37 pm | |
| geiger | May 8, 2006 3:20 am | |
| geiger | May 8, 2006 3:28 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | May 8, 2006 6:21 am | |
| Krzysztof Czaja | May 8, 2006 4:58 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 8, 2006 10:51 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | May 9, 2006 12:42 am | |
| Steffen | May 14, 2006 4:01 am | |
| B. Bogart | Aug 26, 2006 10:45 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 26, 2006 11:04 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] PDDP meeting? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Chris McCormick (chr...@mccormick.cx) | |
| Date: | Apr 30, 2006 6:21:07 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:58:32PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, David Powers wrote:
How can one do object-oriented PD (there are at least some parallels), and how might that differ from other approaches?
First you have to avoid those who say that PD is only for music and/or video; they can't put the word "application" or "program" on a patch or a set of patches, it has to be called "patches".
Second you have to avoid those who say PD isn't object-oriented and especially those who think that you should not use anything that "looks" too object-oriented because it wouldn't fit the "dataflow paradigm", whatever that is.
Third is a rule for OOP in general, in any language: the final goal is never to make a program "more OOP", it's to make a program better, by any "paradigm" necessary.
Fourth, watch out for communists, who are all out to get you.
paint a complete picture, no matter which programming language it is being asked about, even though I think that Pd has more holes than almost all programming languages.
So why are you still using it?
Best,
Chris.
------------------- chr...@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx