atom feed20 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.oicRe: [oic] The Hague expense sheet sce...
FromSent OnAttachments
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgMay 4, 2009 1:14 am 
Hanssens BartMay 4, 2009 4:08 am 
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgMay 4, 2009 5:17 am 
Dennis E. HamiltonMay 4, 2009 6:52 am 
Hanssens BartMay 4, 2009 11:38 pm 
Dennis E. HamiltonMay 5, 2009 9:19 am 
Hanssens BartMay 8, 2009 4:58 am 
Hanssens BartMay 11, 2009 7:55 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comMay 11, 2009 9:24 am 
Dennis E. HamiltonJun 2, 2009 4:01 pm 
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgJun 4, 2009 5:49 am 
Hanssens BartJun 4, 2009 6:07 am 
Dennis E. HamiltonJun 4, 2009 10:17 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJun 4, 2009 11:43 am 
Hanssens BartJun 4, 2009 1:24 pm 
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgJun 5, 2009 2:04 pm 
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgJun 8, 2009 4:44 am 
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgJun 8, 2009 5:29 am 
Hanssens BartJun 8, 2009 5:40 am 
work...@lists.oasis-open.orgJun 9, 2009 1:19 pm 
Subject:Re: [oic] The Hague expense sheet scenario, continued
From:robe...@us.ibm.com (robe@us.ibm.com)
Date:Jun 4, 2009 11:43:16 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.oic

I think this is good enough to be useful. Obviously, there is some judgment involved in what is correct. But I think that gives us three buckets:

1) Obviously correct 2) Obvious incorrect 3) Debatable

So long as the application scenario is capable of identifying real bugs, category 2, then it is useful. We don't need to agree on everything. It is enough that the test case is capable of finding some bugs that we agree are bugs.

-Rob

Hanssens Bart <Bart@fedict.be> wrote on 06/04/2009 09:07:53 AM:

Hi,

As an experiment for the The Hague "expense sheet" application scenario, I've added a "feature point" section at the bottom, with checkboxes for the first part (creating a test document) and a simple javascript (might not work locally) to count the number of check boxes being checked.

Now I do realize that this isn't an exact science, one can always argue about what to check and what not, the scenario itself can be flawed, there is no "weight" involved etc, so that's why I used the term "Feature Points" instead of "Score".

Perhaps I should reformat the page, so you'd have part the scenario with the steps on, and the associated checks on the right (would be easier to read and check). What do you think ?

Best regards,

-----Original Message----- From: work@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:work@lists.oasis-open.org] Sent: donderdag 4 juni 2009 14:50 To: oi@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [oic] Version Control Commit by bart.hanssens

Author: bart.hanssens Date: 2009-06-04 08:50:03 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2009) New Revision: 91 Web View: http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/ oic/?rev=91&sc=1

Modified: AppScenarios/branches/TheHague/appscenarios/oic-expensesheet.html Log: - added "feature points" section