| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 6, 2002 5:02 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 7, 2002 4:42 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 8, 2002 4:40 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 9, 2002 3:44 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 10, 2002 6:19 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 11, 2002 4:30 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 13, 2002 3:59 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 14, 2002 4:56 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 15, 2002 4:49 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 16, 2002 5:00 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 17, 2002 4:08 am | |
| jamin rubio | Sep 17, 2002 5:35 am | |
| Martin Holz | Sep 17, 2002 6:25 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 18, 2002 4:39 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 19, 2002 4:52 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 20, 2002 4:41 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 21, 2002 3:50 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 23, 2002 4:48 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 24, 2002 7:23 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Sep 30, 2002 4:03 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 1, 2002 4:12 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 2, 2002 3:52 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 3, 2002 3:40 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 4, 2002 4:11 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 7, 2002 4:46 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 8, 2002 4:20 am | |
| Christopher Lenz | Oct 9, 2002 12:59 pm | |
| Stefan Bodewig | Oct 9, 2002 11:21 pm | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 10, 2002 4:27 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 11, 2002 4:54 am | |
| Christopher Lenz | Oct 11, 2002 7:52 am | |
| Stefan Bodewig | Oct 11, 2002 8:37 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 12, 2002 4:28 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 13, 2002 4:24 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 14, 2002 4:34 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 15, 2002 4:41 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 16, 2002 4:36 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 17, 2002 4:29 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 18, 2002 4:30 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 19, 2002 4:16 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 20, 2002 4:14 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 21, 2002 5:04 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 25, 2002 4:36 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 26, 2002 4:01 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Oct 27, 2002 3:57 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-slide | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Christopher Lenz (cml...@gmx.de) | |
| Date: | Oct 11, 2002 7:52:49 am | |
| List: | org.apache.jakarta.slide-dev | |
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002, Christopher Lenz <cml...@gmx.de> wrote:
This looks like an error with a test case not in sync with API changes in the client lib, right?
You are keeping some oldish copy of the commons-httpclient code in slide's CVS module and compile against it, so you don't get this error when you work with your local installation of Slide.
... because we needed a stable httpclient-lib, which commons-httpclient hasn't been providing for quite some time... but that's another story ;-)
Gump forces Ant to use the httpclient code that is on its CLASSPATH, which is the latest CVS version.
Wow, I wasn't aware of Gump trying to use commons-httpclient, even though we don't declare it as a dependancy (or do we? we shouldn't). In that case keeping the code in our tree is complete non-sense.
This problem has now been present for several months. The days without a Gump nagging mail have just been days where slide hasn't been built at all because of failed dependencies (usually Tomcat-4).
On a side not, commons-httpclient is rather close to release version 2.0. If its API had changed in a way that makes it no longer suitable for Slide, I bet the commons-httpclient committers would want to know before they do the final release. Detecting such problems is one of Gump's main points.
We've been through that long ago, with the effect that Remy re-imported the code (which originally came from Slide) into our CVS.
Anyway, moving back to commons-httpclient has just become pretty urgent, I guess ;-)
Thanks for the clarifications, Stefan.
-- Christopher Lenz /=/ cmlenz at gmx.de





