-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <000101c0286a$01b509a0$3d9b7ed4@compaq>, David Swarbrick <dav...@swarb.freeuk.com> writes

OK. I can see that licensing is no use because it hangs upon my ownership. I can license you to "borrow my car any Friday afternoon" because it's my car, and I can say "but you must bring it back clean and undented" also because it's my car. (If you walk into the carpark and friendly Finance Ltd have repossessed then you can say "I have an arrangement to use that car", and they say "not with us you haven't").

Surely if I "give co-equal ownership of their version to anyone interested in having the document, with a wish that they will likewise pass on ownership to others" when I am fully entitled to.... I'm not already sitting on the debts which will likely result in bankruptcy.... then that is fairly irrevocable. Especially in the courts of their country.

Surely the bankruptcy courts cannot RETROSPECTIVELY set aside transfers made when the bankruptcy was neither in effect nor clearly probable. Especially the courts of the recipient's country are not likely to see him cheated in this way. I hear what you say that token payment may or may not succeed, it presents only an obstacle to be argued.

In article <000001c0286a$00541a10$3d9b7ed4@compaq>, David Swarbrick <dav...@swarb.freeuk.com> writes

thanks for clarifying the issues.

- -- ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^ http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/ (..)__u news:alt.smoking.mooses

happy as a clam at high tide -. <_" .-._.-.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBOdIJwX8v/Y5zkfRPEQKxpgCeK48WiclNiSDhuW23yKgr/Ltkf6EAoJhw FVM9hkX8HbvTiizarE8NSzSg =+mEA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----