atom feed29 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xriRE: [xri] Property, rel comparison
FromSent OnAttachments
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 25, 2010 9:04 am 
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 25, 2010 9:06 am 
Scott CantorJan 25, 2010 9:16 am 
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 25, 2010 9:20 am 
Scott CantorJan 25, 2010 9:37 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 25, 2010 9:44 am 
Scott CantorJan 25, 2010 10:24 am 
Drummond ReedJan 26, 2010 12:08 am 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 6:59 am 
Drummond ReedJan 26, 2010 7:31 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 8:31 am 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 8:38 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 8:57 am 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 9:00 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 9:06 am 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 9:13 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 9:19 am 
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 26, 2010 9:20 am 
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 26, 2010 9:24 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 9:29 am 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 9:38 am 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 9:42 am 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 10:02 am 
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 26, 2010 12:26 pm 
Eran Hammer-LahavJan 26, 2010 12:32 pm 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 12:44 pm 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 12:46 pm 
Breno de MedeirosJan 26, 2010 1:02 pm 
Scott CantorJan 26, 2010 1:47 pm 
Subject:RE: [xri] Property, rel comparison
From:Scott Cantor (cant@osu.edu)
Date:Jan 26, 2010 10:02:19 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.xri

Breno de Medeiros wrote on 2010-01-26:

If it's application-specific, then it's not scheme-specific either, it's just application-specific.

Do we really need this level of generality?

I was trying to "interpret" Eran's comments in a precise way, since the point here is to get the spec done. He said application-specific and that to me is not the same as a scheme-specific (unless by application we mean "URI application").

According to Eran, these are not URIs, but XML namespaces in URI format.

No, they're similar to URIs that identify XML namespaces in that they're solely identifiers, need not resolve, and can follow the same (trivial) comparison rules. But no, these are not actually XML namespaces and we wouldn't reference them as such.

-- Scott