Dave,
Do you have an internal router at each site?
If you do use EIGRP on those routers and GRE tunnels.
The EIGRP will pass traffic over the GRE and the dynamically route the
data based on the VPN delay.
This will be totally independent of the ISP status...
I think I would use 2811 or 2801 VPN routers....
2801 would be cheaper than the PIX anyway.. And give you other
functions.....
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Breiland [mailto:supe...@dynamicis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 12:56 PM
To: cisc...@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] PIX VPN Mesh w/ OSPF
I want to make sure I'm on the right track and haven't set myself up for
failure...
I have 4 offices around the US. Each site has a different ISP...
connected with a T1. My plan was to have a PIX-515 at each site. I
would use the PIX's to create VPNs between each and every site. My
guess is that there will be times that the ISPs will have routing issues
between each other. To get around this, I would think that...
-Route between Site A and Site B fails
-Site B re-routes data to Site C which still has VPN to Site A.
Presumably this would require EIGRP or OSPF. Unfortunately it looks
like the PIX only supports OSPF.
Is this the right direction/steps I should be taking?
Am I just over complicating things?
Has anyone had success with OSPF and the PIXs?
Thanks for any input.
10 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] PIX VPN Mesh w/ OSPF
