atom feed19 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-usbusb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 663...
FromSent OnAttachments
Eugene GrosbeinSep 25, 2007 11:19 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 25, 2007 11:19 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 25, 2007 11:22 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 25, 2007 11:22 am 
Warner LoshSep 25, 2007 11:53 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 25, 2007 9:52 pm 
M. Warner LoshSep 25, 2007 10:11 pm 
M. Warner LoshSep 25, 2007 10:17 pm 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 26, 2007 4:39 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 26, 2007 7:30 am 
M. Warner LoshSep 26, 2007 7:39 am 
M. Warner LoshSep 26, 2007 7:39 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 26, 2007 7:52 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 26, 2007 9:44 am 
Hans Petter SelaskySep 26, 2007 9:55 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 27, 2007 6:37 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 27, 2007 9:43 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 28, 2007 6:25 am 
Eugene GrosbeinSep 28, 2007 6:29 am 
Subject:usb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 6630 mobile phone does notwork
From:M. Warner Losh (im@bsdimp.com)
Date:Sep 25, 2007 10:11:56 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-usb

In message: <46F9@kuzbass.ru> Eugene Grosbein <eug@kuzbass.ru> writes: : Warner Losh wrote: : > : > Have you tried porting -current's umodem driver back to stable? I : > think it would work a lot better... : : I've glanced at CURRENT's umodem and there is no that code : allowing to work with devices without CM descriptor using UNION instead... : NetBSD has that code since 2005. : : Do you think CURRENT's umodem would be useble in this case?

My modem doesn't have a CM descriptor and I quirked it before. I removed the quirk code and it works now without it. The Union code from NetBSD didn't look relevant at all when you chased down all the things that it actually did, but maybe I missed something.

Given that umodem from current should just work on -stable w/o any changes (you may need ucom too, which does need one or two changes), it would be worth a shot at trying it.

Warner