| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Maxim Dounin | Mar 22, 2010 11:20 am | |
| Ryan Malayter | Mar 23, 2010 6:12 am | |
| Maxim Dounin | Mar 23, 2010 6:46 am | |
| Ryan Malayter | Mar 24, 2010 5:47 am | |
| Maxim Dounin | Mar 24, 2010 7:20 am | |
| Ryan Malayter | Mar 24, 2010 3:49 pm | |
| Maxim Dounin | Mar 24, 2010 4:47 pm | |
| theromis1 | Apr 16, 2010 12:14 pm | |
| Maxim Dounin | Apr 17, 2010 2:36 am | |
| theromis1 | Apr 19, 2010 2:14 pm | |
| Maxim Dounin | Apr 19, 2010 7:15 pm | |
| theromis1 | Apr 20, 2010 4:00 pm | |
| Maxim Dounin | Apr 21, 2010 8:19 pm | |
| theromis1 | Apr 22, 2010 6:35 pm | |
| theromis1 | Apr 27, 2010 3:29 pm | |
| theromis1 | May 3, 2010 10:31 am |
| Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] gunzip filter module 0.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | theromis1 (ngin...@nginx.us) | |
| Date: | Apr 16, 2010 12:14:31 pm | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
Hi,
my company working with ad insertion on Internet traffic.
For that I'm trying to use nginx. Some text/html traffic goes with
Content-encoding: gzip.
So to parse html inside this traffic I've tried gunzip. And it partially works
with some hacks. One of my problem was function ngx_http_gzip_ok which returns
NGX_OK if in headers doesn't exists Via header, all traffic which I'm passing
throw gunzip don't have this header.
My question, is it correct to use gunzip module in my case, or better to try
another module?
If my decision is correct, may I send you my changes for gunzip to add for it
functionality which my company need?
Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,66713,75868#msg-75868
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list ngi...@nginx.org http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx





