atom feed35 messages in org.haskell.haskell[Haskell] PROPOSAL: class aliases
FromSent OnAttachments
John MeachamOct 12, 2005 7:41 pm 
Philippa CowderoyOct 12, 2005 7:55 pm 
John MeachamOct 12, 2005 8:16 pm 
Wolfgang JeltschOct 13, 2005 5:48 am 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 6:03 am 
Malcolm WallaceOct 13, 2005 6:15 am 
Andres LoehOct 13, 2005 6:23 am 
Malcolm WallaceOct 13, 2005 6:29 am 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 6:37 am 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 6:39 am 
Simon Peyton-JonesOct 13, 2005 7:02 am 
Benjamin FranksenOct 13, 2005 7:26 am 
Benjamin FranksenOct 13, 2005 7:33 am 
S.M.KahrsOct 13, 2005 7:37 am 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 8:32 am 
Simon Peyton-JonesOct 13, 2005 9:23 am 
Udo StenzelOct 13, 2005 9:46 am 
Jan-Willem MaessenOct 13, 2005 9:58 am 
Paul GovereauOct 13, 2005 1:21 pm 
Jacques CaretteOct 13, 2005 1:52 pm 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 4:45 pm 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 6:13 pm 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 6:21 pm 
David MenendezOct 13, 2005 6:49 pm 
John MeachamOct 13, 2005 8:33 pm 
aj...@spamcop.netOct 13, 2005 11:25 pm 
Ashley YakeleyOct 14, 2005 6:20 am 
Ashley YakeleyOct 14, 2005 6:31 am 
Wolfgang JeltschOct 14, 2005 9:46 am 
Wolfgang JeltschOct 14, 2005 11:44 am 
Wolfgang JeltschOct 14, 2005 11:47 am 
Remi TurkOct 14, 2005 2:05 pm 
Udo StenzelOct 15, 2005 6:15 am 
Ross PatersonOct 27, 2005 6:58 am 
Wolfgang JeltschOct 28, 2005 7:05 am 
Subject:[Haskell] PROPOSAL: class aliases
From:John Meacham (jo@repetae.net)
Date:Oct 13, 2005 6:13:51 pm
List:org.haskell.haskell

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Benjamin Franksen wrote:

Using '=' instead of '=>', you could even leave out the 'alias':

class FooBar a = (Foo a, Bar a) where ...

true. for the purposes of discussion I think I will keep using the 'alias' so it is clearer what is going on. but if it were actually implemented we could decide whether we want it or not. John

-- John Meacham - ?repetae.net?john?