atom feed4 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.oasis-board-commentRE: [oasis-board-comment] Proposed ch...
FromSent OnAttachments
Eduardo GutentagMar 10, 2010 1:30 pm 
Michael DeNicolaMar 11, 2010 9:23 am 
Eduardo GutentagMar 11, 2010 11:39 am 
Michael DeNicolaMar 11, 2010 10:24 pm 
Subject:RE: [oasis-board-comment] Proposed changes to the OASIS Bylaws
From:Michael DeNicola (MDeN@us.fujitsu.com)
Date:Mar 11, 2010 9:23:43 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.oasis-board-comment

Eduardo,

Good question. Thanks for asking.

Currently there are two ways to become a Director: 1) Be elected by the Membership 2) Be appointed by the Board to fill a vacancy

The reason for "duly elected" is to prohibit a Director who is appointed by the Board from being an Officer of OASIS.

The reason for "duly" is it just seems like a more legal way to write it. Would I object to just "elected", "No". But I do ask, what is wrong with prohibiting something even if it has never happened yet?

Regards, Mike

-----Original Message----- From: Edua@Sun.COM [mailto:Edua@Sun.COM] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 1:31 PM To: oasi@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [oasis-board-comment] Proposed changes to the OASIS Bylaws

Regarding the proposed changes to Section 2 of Article 4, have there ever been, are there now, or will there ever be unduly elected members of the Board of Directors? Or duly non-elected members of the Board of Directors? What is the reasoning behind the qualification of members of the Board of Directors as "duly elected" in the proposed change?