atom feed122 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework
FromSent OnAttachments
46 earlier messages
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkSep 24, 2009 2:35 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoSep 24, 2009 6:43 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 11, 2009 8:38 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 12, 2009 1:02 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 14, 2009 2:13 pm 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 15, 2009 1:03 pm 
Boris DerzhavetsOct 16, 2009 12:47 am.gz
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 16, 2009 2:01 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 20, 2009 9:57 am.patch
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 21, 2009 4:53 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 21, 2009 11:31 am 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 21, 2009 11:51 am 
Jeremy FitzhardingeOct 21, 2009 12:49 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 21, 2009 1:21 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 27, 2009 8:46 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 27, 2009 9:59 am.makefile, .c
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 27, 2009 10:29 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 27, 2009 12:40 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 27, 2009 12:45 pm 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkOct 27, 2009 1:12 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 27, 2009 1:17 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 27, 2009 1:23 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenOct 27, 2009 1:35 pm 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 11, 2009 4:46 pm 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 11, 2009 4:59 pm 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 12, 2009 3:50 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 12, 2009 9:26 pm 
Keir FraserNov 12, 2009 11:24 pm 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 13, 2009 3:56 pm 
Keir FraserNov 14, 2009 12:04 am 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 16, 2009 2:37 am.patch, .patch
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 16, 2009 10:37 am 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 16, 2009 7:12 pm 
Keir FraserNov 16, 2009 7:44 pm 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 16, 2009 9:12 pm 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 16, 2009 9:19 pm 
Keir FraserNov 16, 2009 9:43 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 17, 2009 4:45 am.patch
Keir FraserNov 17, 2009 5:04 am 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 17, 2009 6:16 am 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 17, 2009 10:50 am 
Keir FraserNov 17, 2009 11:49 am 
Jiang, YunhongNov 17, 2009 7:11 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 17, 2009 7:24 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 17, 2009 7:37 pm 
Keir FraserNov 18, 2009 1:36 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 18, 2009 6:14 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 18, 2009 6:29 am 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 19, 2009 5:45 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 19, 2009 5:47 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 24, 2009 2:04 am.patch, .patch
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 24, 2009 11:25 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 24, 2009 11:43 am 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 24, 2009 3:34 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 24, 2009 5:41 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 24, 2009 6:43 pm 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 25, 2009 5:41 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 25, 2009 6:09 am 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 25, 2009 7:21 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 25, 2009 10:00 am 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 25, 2009 10:58 am 
Jeremy FitzhardingeNov 25, 2009 11:13 am 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 25, 2009 5:11 pm 
Zhang, XiantaoNov 26, 2009 3:52 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 30, 2009 6:26 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkNov 30, 2009 6:33 am 
Zhang, XiantaoDec 2, 2009 6:13 pm 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkDec 3, 2009 6:37 am 
Stefan KuhneDec 4, 2009 8:07 am 
Pasi KärkkäinenDec 4, 2009 10:57 am 
Jeremy FitzhardingeDec 4, 2009 11:26 am 
Pasi KärkkäinenJan 1, 2010 9:20 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkJan 4, 2010 5:37 am 
Pasi KärkkäinenJan 4, 2010 11:41 am 
Konrad Rzeszutek WilkJan 14, 2010 12:05 pm 
Pasi KärkkäinenJan 14, 2010 11:18 pm 
Subject:RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework
From:Zhang, Xiantao (xian@intel.com)
Date:Nov 19, 2009 5:47:16 pm
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:37:51AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:

On 11/17/09 06:17, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:

Originally, this patch is target to get rid of ioapic changes in dom0. Before this patch, GSI irq should be mapped and setup through dom0 programming ioapic entries, but it depends on using ioapic logic in dom0. And if we remove ioapic logic from dom0, we need to find new way how to setup GSI irq. And this patch comes out under this situation. The idea is from that in Xen the interface MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI is used to build the pirq and irq mapping for MSI IRQ for each domain. Since MSI IRQ can be setup through this hypercall, and I think we also can leverage the interface MAP_PIRQ_TYPE _GSI to build the mapping for GSI irq. Further analysis showes that this interface is only used for assigning devices to HVM domain in qemu, and I think it should be Okay for dom0 building the mapping between its pirq and irq. One different thing for GSI irq is that more info should be provided in the call, since GSI IRQ has different trigger-mode and polarity (originally it is provided by ioapic write in dom0). Certainly, I also think we need to document the related info, and if you agree to the change, I am happy to add it.

I don't think there's any need to overload the existing interface though. If we're adding new functionality then we can add a new interface for it (but with luck we can reuse most of the existing code to implement it).

If you're already considering a "treat this differently" flag in the argument, then that's a strong pointer that a new interface is warranted.

Agree, and I also don't object to add a similar interface. Since this existing interface is only used for hvm domain before, and just want to re-use it for dom.

I am pretty sure it is used for PV domains too. Look in 'xen_create_msi_irq', which extracts the domain that has a PCI device for pass-through and on behalf of that domain makes the MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI call.

Furthermore, it is also used by Dom0 for MSI devices.

We mean the call MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_GSI, not MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI.

What do you mean by 're-use it for dom'?

Oh, seems the char "0" is missing, should be dom0. Xiantao