atom feed28 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: Here is what I promised :-)
FromSent OnAttachments
John S. DysonJun 20, 1998 3:22 pm 
Amancio HastyJun 20, 1998 5:21 pm 
MikeJun 20, 1998 5:54 pm 
Chuck RobeyJun 20, 1998 6:41 pm 
Amancio HastyJun 20, 1998 7:51 pm 
Poul-Henning KampJun 21, 1998 12:40 pm 
John S. DysonJun 21, 1998 3:44 pm 
Dom MitchellJun 21, 1998 11:39 pm 
John S. DysonJun 22, 1998 12:13 am 
Dag-Erling Coidan SmørgravJun 22, 1998 12:52 am 
John S. DysonJun 22, 1998 1:00 am 
Dag-Erling Coidan SmørgravJun 22, 1998 1:14 am 
John S. DysonJun 22, 1998 1:24 am 
IBS / Andre OppermannJun 22, 1998 3:54 am 
Jean-Marc ZucconiJun 22, 1998 10:05 am 
David KellyJun 22, 1998 7:04 pm 
Wilko BulteJun 23, 1998 10:15 am 
John S. DysonJun 23, 1998 10:55 am 
Eivind EklundJun 23, 1998 6:41 pm 
David KellyJun 23, 1998 8:59 pm 
John S. DysonJun 23, 1998 9:42 pm 
Greg LeheyJun 25, 1998 1:50 am 
Eivind EklundJun 25, 1998 2:11 am 
DennisJun 25, 1998 7:11 am 
Greg LeheyJun 25, 1998 4:37 pm 
David KellyJun 25, 1998 8:15 pm 
John S. DysonJun 25, 1998 10:10 pm 
DennisJun 26, 1998 10:26 am 
Subject:Re: Here is what I promised :-)
From:Dom Mitchell (do@myrddin.demon.co.uk)
Date:Jun 21, 1998 11:39:33 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

"John S. Dyson" <dys@iquest.net> writes:

Maybe, but I *am* working on a scalable and forward looking kernel that will perform about the same as a conventional kernel, except where the conventional kernel doesn't perform well at all. The abstractions that we are working on, work both on PC's, on SMP PC's, multiple machines (acting essentially as one machine), and even heterogeneous machines (in a limited fashion.)

Got it! You're working on FreePlan9. :-)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message