| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Asgeir Frimannsson | Oct 23, 2006 10:15 pm | |
| Doug Domeny | Oct 24, 2006 5:47 am | |
| Doug Domeny | Oct 24, 2006 7:06 am | .zip |
| brya...@exgate.tek.com | Oct 24, 2006 9:49 am | |
| brya...@exgate.tek.com | Oct 24, 2006 9:58 am | |
| Asgeir Frimannsson | Oct 26, 2006 6:53 pm | .zip |
| Subject: | Section 2.5.4 Validating Documents with Extensions - needs revision | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Asgeir Frimannsson (asge...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 23, 2006 10:15:00 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.xliff-comment | |
Tony, Doug, all,
Referring to spec revision 20061023 (http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200610/msg00022.html):
"The only change made to the spec was to add a note indicating that external schema's would not be validated by the Transitional XSD."
Both the transitional AND strict schemas were changed to use processContents='skip'. I just noticed that this unfortunately also invalidates section 2.5.4. (Validating Documents with Extensions) of the specification:
"In order to validate an XLIFF document that contains non-XLIFF parts, you can use the schema validation mechanism: In addition to the namespace declarations, add the schemaLocation attribute of the XML Schema-instance namespace to define what schemas to use to validate the document (XLIFF and the non-XLIFF namespaces)."
Also note the reference to section 2.5.4 from section 3.1. (XML Declaration).
If the spec is being updated again as a result of this, also notice the small insignificant layout-mistake in section 3.1: "The same example as above would then look like this:<?xml version="1.0"?>" - the xml declaration should be part of the following example, and not this paragraph.
cheers, asgeir
-- Asgeir Frimannsson PhD Candidate School of Software Engineering and Data Communications Queensland University of Technology 126 Margaret Street, Level 3 Brisbane QLD 4001, Australia
Phone: (+61) 7 3138 9332 Mob: (+61) 405 412 696 Email: a.fr...@qut.edu.au






.zip