3 messages in com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy[sqlalchemy] Re: Arguments for SA ove...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ken Kuhlman26 Apr 2007 11:44 
sdob...@sistechnology.com26 Apr 2007 13:05 
Ken Kuhlman27 Apr 2007 08:06 
Subject:[sqlalchemy] Re: Arguments for SA over django ORM
From:Ken Kuhlman (ksku@gmail.com)
Date:04/27/2007 08:06:24 AM
List:com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy

On Apr 26, 3:05 pm, sdob@sistechnology.com wrote:

what a DB vendor would have to do with ORM? the DB-related layer ('engine' in SA), yes, but orm?

Yes, of course I mean the engine layer. I apologize if that was somehow unclear.

i'm not familiar with how thick django's layers are, maybe just try to compare the complexities. If SA notion of DB-engine is less complex/entangled that django's then u have a 'plus' - it would be cheaper/easier for them to do it.

I don't see cheapness as a driving factor here.. as a supplier you do what the market compels you to do.

But then, it would be a manager's decision so try to think as (marketing)manager. Which means: answer yourself the question 'where the money is'. in both directions 'come' and 'gone'.

Which is why I discussed the sizes of the installed bases.

thumb's up svilen

thanks, -Ken