12 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-questionsRe: Interested in getting Free BSD| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| John Winter | Feb 25, 1996 10:58 pm | |
| Doug White | Feb 26, 1996 10:20 am | |
| invalid opcode | Feb 26, 1996 1:48 pm | |
| Humprey C. Sy | Feb 27, 1996 7:07 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Feb 27, 1996 1:16 pm | |
| Doug White | Feb 27, 1996 1:32 pm | |
| Doug White | Feb 27, 1996 1:36 pm | |
| invalid opcode | Feb 27, 1996 2:00 pm | |
| Doug White | Feb 27, 1996 2:45 pm | |
| invalid opcode | Feb 27, 1996 3:12 pm | |
| Dave Andersen | Feb 27, 1996 11:46 pm | |
| Doug White | Feb 28, 1996 10:34 am |
| Subject: | Re: Interested in getting Free BSD | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Humprey C. Sy (hump...@linux1.dlsu.edu.ph) | |
| Date: | Feb 27, 1996 7:07:21 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-questions | |
On Mon, 26 Feb 1996, Doug White wrote:
HI I am interested in getting a copy of Free BSD. I am also wondering if Linux is comperable to this program.
In the sense that it's a free UNIX, yes. In the sense that it's the same variant of UNIX (sysV) then no.
I believe FreeBSD is much more "organized" as compared to Linux, with respect to support, and source code. Linux may be more popular though, so this might attest to its satisfactory performance. In my case, I'd choose FreeBSD anytime.
Which will serve me better if I set up a server.
Let me note that you are asking in the FreeBSD SUPPORT forum..:)
I know of several FreeBSD Web servers (including mine) that are doing an excellent job.
The usenix review also pointed out FreeBSD showed the best network performance.
Is your program more easy to set up than Linux?
About as easy. A group ant Stanford who published a paper for Usenix thought that Linux was the easiest to install, then FreeBSD and Solaris x86.
I really feel FreeSD is easier... Don't know how that report came to show that result.
- Humprey -