Would you consider this new realse stable? Im working on a telnet bbs, with a mysql back end, which will linked to the web via php. Considering the ability grab results using ["fieldname"] is being cut (is that correct?) I want to be using the latest version. Also will this work a-ok with gcc 3.3 now?

Darren

Talk about "release early, release often"! :)

o Renamed mysql++, defs and define_short files, adding .hh to the end of each. (They're header files!) This shouldn't impact library users, since these are hopefully used internal to the library only.

o Removed sqlplus.hh file. Use mysql++.hh instead.

o Added mysql++.spec, extracted from contributed 1.7.9 source RPM, and updated it significantly. Also, added an 'rpm' target to Makefile.am to automate the process of building RPMs.

o Added bootstrap and LGPL files to distribution tarball.

o Added pre-1.7.10 history to this file.

o Removed .version file. Apparently it's something required by old versions of libtool.

I've also added a binary RPM for RH9 to the web page.

http://tangentsoft.net/mysql++/

I may not continue offering these RPMs, as they're rather large, and it's not hard to make your own: just say 'make rpm' as root.