atom feed24 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archsome PRs
FromSent OnAttachments
Nicolas SouchuJul 16, 2004 1:08 pm 
Mark LinimonJul 16, 2004 2:33 pm 
Nicolas SouchuJul 16, 2004 2:51 pm 
David O'BrienJul 17, 2004 8:15 pm 
Robert MillanJul 18, 2004 6:33 am 
Bruce M SimpsonJul 18, 2004 8:07 am 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 18, 2004 9:31 am 
Robert MillanJul 18, 2004 9:35 am 
Robert MillanJul 18, 2004 9:51 am 
Kris KennawayJul 18, 2004 10:51 am 
Pawel Jakub DawidekJul 18, 2004 11:39 am 
M. Warner LoshJul 18, 2004 11:59 pm 
Pawel Jakub DawidekJul 19, 2004 1:17 am 
M. Warner LoshJul 19, 2004 7:23 am 
Max LaierJul 19, 2004 9:57 am 
Nicolas SouchuJul 20, 2004 3:23 pm 
Sergey BabkinJul 26, 2004 4:49 pm 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 26, 2004 8:29 pm 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 26, 2004 8:35 pm 
Peter JeremyJul 27, 2004 1:44 am 
Sergey BabkinJul 27, 2004 9:37 am 
Sergey BabkinJul 27, 2004 9:37 am 
Pawel Jakub DawidekJul 27, 2004 9:52 am 
Garance A DrosihnJul 27, 2004 10:39 am 
Subject:some PRs
From:Nicolas Souchu (nso@free.fr)
Date:Jul 16, 2004 2:51:04 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:34:09PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Nicolas Souchu wrote:

Depending on the patch size, some work may or may not take place on Perforce first.

Opinions?

My only concern is that we may be getting close enough to the code freeze for 5-STABLE, which has so many other areas that need stabilization first, that we might want to consider holding off until 6-CURRENT is branched. I'm guessing, from reading some of the bullet-item summaries, that our ability to ensure stabilization is going to be sufficiently challenged as it is :-)

Indeed.

This should probably be a re@ call. I do not remember, myself, when the freeze is scheduled for.

August or so?

But definitely. I'm not targeting immediate releases but later ones and at least start gathering their work in the meantime.

Nicholas