atom feed9 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stablembufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug
FromSent OnAttachments
ChrisJan 6, 2005 6:12 am 
Bosko MilekicJan 6, 2005 2:38 pm 
ChrisJan 8, 2005 12:43 pm 
Bosko MilekicJan 21, 2005 9:52 am 
ChrisJan 21, 2005 12:42 pm 
Bosko MilekicJan 31, 2005 7:14 pm 
ChrisFeb 1, 2005 5:18 am 
Bosko MilekicFeb 1, 2005 7:37 am 
ChrisFeb 1, 2005 9:16 pm 
Subject:mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug
From:Chris (chrc@gmail.com)
Date:Feb 1, 2005 9:16:28 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Chris <chrc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 +0000 Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug To: Bosko Milekic <bmil@technokratis.com>

0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented out) is auto. Or at least the docs say that. If I am wrong the docs need updating and it is defenitly a bug as netstat -m output is different.

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500, Bosko Milekic <bmil@technokratis.com> wrote:

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +0000, Chris wrote:

Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is any specific types of tests you want doing.

I'm not sure I understand. Setting it to zero _means_ "auto."

I'll likely commit the patch. Thanks.