jna-posix started out pretty simple, but it quickly became apparent we'd
need better smarts for it to work across platform. I'd like to avoid
duplicating effort too, so maybe your library could be folded into
jna-posix? Really it would just need to have a class full of static
methods that use a global POSIX instance from jna-posix. Then you're
essentially done, and jna-posix will handle all the platform selection, etc.
Kevin Burton wrote:
I saw that one eventually.... I took the approach to make everything
static imports so the API is a bit more like Posix.....
They should also make it with a tar.gz, etc...... either way, my
implementation is like 100 lines of code so I'm not super worried about
duplicated effort right now :)
Kevin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Peter Reilly
<pete...@gmail.com <mailto:pete...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There is already such a project:
http://kenai.com/projects/jna-posix
Peter
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com
<mailto:bur...@spinn3r.com>> wrote:
> Hey guys.
> I've started a simple posix binding project for use internally.
I have the
> need for mkfifo, stat, etc.
> It would seem to make sense to open source this and put it on google
> code....
> Any thoughts as to whether this would be a good idea?
> Kevin
>
> --
> Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> Location: San Francisco, CA
> AIM/YIM: sfburtonator
> Skype: burtonator
> Work: http://spinn3r.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user...@jna.dev.java.net
<mailto:user...@jna.dev.java.net>
For additional commands, e-mail: user...@jna.dev.java.net
<mailto:user...@jna.dev.java.net>
8 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Java posix binding pr...
