| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| ach...@saysit.com | Sep 29, 2002 1:44 am | |
| ach...@saysit.com | Sep 29, 2002 4:20 am | |
| ach...@saysit.com | Sep 29, 2002 4:23 am | |
| ach...@saysit.com | Sep 29, 2002 4:26 am | |
| Barry Moore | Sep 29, 2002 3:39 pm | |
| V. Cekvenich | Sep 29, 2002 5:31 pm | |
| Kent Perrier | Sep 29, 2002 6:07 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Sep 29, 2002 6:39 pm | |
| Oskar Bartenstein | Sep 29, 2002 8:30 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Sep 29, 2002 10:17 pm | |
| Oskar Bartenstein | Sep 30, 2002 1:10 am | |
| Turner, John | Sep 30, 2002 5:35 am | |
| Turner, John | Sep 30, 2002 5:38 am | |
| Step...@bmwfin.com | Sep 30, 2002 5:38 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Sep 30, 2002 9:22 am | |
| Glenn Nielsen | Sep 30, 2002 1:13 pm | |
| Glenn Nielsen | Sep 30, 2002 1:45 pm |
| Subject: | RE: Best Practices Question | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Turner, John (JTur...@AAS.com) | |
| Date: | Sep 30, 2002 5:35:37 am | |
| List: | org.apache.tomcat.users | |
This has been discussed quite a bit. I can think of dozens of reasons to use Apache, not one of them related to serving simple HTTP/1.1 static content, which is pretty much all that the HTTP connector on Tomcat does.
Tomcat cannot do it all.
Think outside of the box.
John
-----Original Message----- From: V. Cekvenich [mailto:vi...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 8:32 PM To: tomc...@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Best Practices Question
I think there is no reason to use Apache. Tomcat can do it all and it is simpler this way.
Plus Tomcat can do JSPs, etc.
V.
Barry Moore wrote:
I have not used Tomacat in a couple years. The last time I used it, our companies policy was to integrate with Apache and get Apache to do the serving duties and just use Tomcat as the jsp processor.
With Tomact 4 is this still considered a good practice for high traffic sites?
Thanks, Barry
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com





