| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Nash | Sep 26, 2007 6:42 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Sep 27, 2007 8:48 am | |
| Barack, Ron | Oct 4, 2007 11:03 am | |
| Barack, Ron | Oct 4, 2007 11:07 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Oct 4, 2007 12:03 pm | |
| Peshev, Peter | Oct 4, 2007 11:29 pm | |
| Peshev, Peter | Oct 5, 2007 1:19 am | |
| Michael Rowley | Oct 5, 2007 6:23 am | |
| Simon Nash | Jan 15, 2008 1:44 pm | |
| Peshev, Peter | Jan 16, 2008 2:22 am | |
| Mike Edwards | Jan 16, 2008 4:44 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Jan 17, 2008 4:01 am | |
| Mike Edwards | Jan 21, 2008 9:41 am | |
| Simon Nash | Jan 31, 2008 8:56 am | |
| Mike Edwards | Feb 1, 2008 3:02 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Feb 1, 2008 6:38 am | |
| Simon Nash | Feb 7, 2008 9:37 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Feb 7, 2008 10:03 am | |
| Michael Rowley | Feb 7, 2008 11:33 am | |
| Mike Edwards | Feb 8, 2008 3:39 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Feb 8, 2008 3:44 am | |
| Mike Edwards | Feb 8, 2008 3:50 am | |
| Peshev, Peter | Feb 8, 2008 4:02 am | |
| David Booz | Feb 11, 2008 1:08 pm |
| Subject: | RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 11: Semantics of getCallbackID() are underspecified | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Michael Rowley (mrow...@bea.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 5, 2007 6:23:20 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.sca-j | |
I was thinking that some bindings may have the client-side choose the ID, while others (where there is a synchronous exchange with the first message) may have the service provider provide the id. But looking at it more carefully, I see that both scenarios would result in the same client-visible behavior (null at 4, and non-null at 6).
Michael
-----Original Message----- From: Peshev, Peter [mailto:pete...@sap.com] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:30 AM To: sca...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 11: Semantics of getCallbackID() are underspecified
Hi,
I fully agree with the proposal, but I am not sure I understand the concern of Michael raised during the meeting that different bindings may behave differently. I would expect that the only interraction with the binding will happen at point 5 when the proxy will invoke it, and before that everything should be one and the same and there is no problem to specify the semantics.
@Michael - is there something that I am missing ?
Best Regards Peter
-----Original Message----- From: Barack, Ron [mailto:ron....@sap.com] Sent: Thursday, 4. October 2007 21:03 To: sca...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [sca-j] ISSUE 11: Semantics of getCallbackID() are underspecified
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-11
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Simon Nash [mailto:NA...@uk.ibm.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2007 15:43 An: sca...@lists.oasis-open.org Betreff: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Semantics of getCallbackID() are underspecified
TARGET:
Java Common Annotations and APIs specification, section "Java API" / {"CallableReference"}
DESCRIPTION:
The getCallbackID() method description doesn't specify the initial state of the returned value and the events that cause this value to change.
Consider the following sequence of events: 1) A ServiceReference is created, either by injection or by ComponentContext.getServiceReference(). 2) getCallbackID() is called on the ServiceReference. 3) A type-safe reference (proxy) is created from the ServiceReference by CallableReference.getService(). 4) getCallbackID() is called on the ServiceReference. 5) A service call is made through the type-safe reference. 6) getCallbackID() is called on the ServiceReference.
It seems reasonably intuitive that call 2) will return null and call 6) will return the system-generated callback ID that was used for the service call. It's less clear what call 4) will return. Does the system-generated callback ID get created and set into the ServiceReference as part of event 3) or as part of event 5)?
The description of the getCallbackID() method should describe a "state model" for how the value returned would change based on other actions.
PROPOSAL:
At point 2) the value returned will be null. At point 4, it will still be null, At point 6), it will be the system-generated callback ID that was used for the service call 5). This information should be stated explicitly in the description of getCallbackID().
Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU





