| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Remy Maucherat | Jun 20, 2002 4:28 pm | |
| cost...@covalent.net | Jun 20, 2002 7:29 pm | |
| Michael A. Smith | Jun 20, 2002 7:57 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jun 20, 2002 8:13 pm | |
| cost...@covalent.net | Jun 20, 2002 10:24 pm | |
| Juozas Baliuka | Jun 20, 2002 11:39 pm | |
| jean-frederic clere | Jun 21, 2002 12:08 am | |
| jean-frederic clere | Jun 21, 2002 1:27 am | |
| Remy Maucherat | Jun 21, 2002 3:18 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jun 21, 2002 1:04 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] New committer: Patrick Luby | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Remy Maucherat (re...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | Jun 21, 2002 3:18:54 am | |
| List: | org.apache.commons.dev | |
Michael A. Smith wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Patrick is a Tomcat committer who plans to contribute new code to the commons-daemon module (and he's actually mentioned in the status document). I can commit his code for him, at which point karma would probably be granted to him, but I think it would be easier is he just did it himslef.
Please send your +1s if you agree (he has mine).
It doesn't matter. If he's a jakarta committer, he can get access to the sandbox just by asking, no vote needed (daemon is still in the sandbox).
Ok, good. I wasn't aware of that rule. Can someone give him karma on the sandbox then if he doesn't have it ?
Daemon will likely become an important component of the next major Tomcat version, so expect some activity there.
Been waiting for activity for a while now. For daemon and for that
"wrapper" component that was proposed:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org&msgNo=5400
As envisioned, we wanted 3 main features in the daemon: - system integration (that's the current daemon code, which needs a bit more work) - launcher capabilities (bye, bye scripts, which is especially useful under Windows) - JVM failure recovery for higher reliability (that's one of the main features of the wrapper)
Remy





