atom feed30 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: trek73
FromSent OnAttachments
John W. DeBoskeyOct 23, 1999 8:42 pm 
Matthew DillonOct 23, 1999 8:53 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 23, 1999 9:03 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardOct 23, 1999 9:06 pm 
Matthew DillonOct 23, 1999 9:09 pm 
Chuck RobeyOct 23, 1999 9:16 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardOct 23, 1999 9:22 pm 
Mike SmithOct 23, 1999 9:53 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardOct 23, 1999 10:04 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesOct 23, 1999 10:07 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardOct 23, 1999 10:13 pm 
Jim BryantOct 24, 1999 1:21 am 
Darryl OkahataOct 24, 1999 1:22 am 
Gary JennejohnOct 24, 1999 1:59 am 
Jordan K. HubbardOct 24, 1999 3:00 am 
Matthew DillonOct 24, 1999 11:20 am 
Matthew DillonOct 24, 1999 11:23 am 
Darryl OkahataOct 24, 1999 3:56 pm 
Kris KennawayOct 25, 1999 12:33 pm 
Jim BryantOct 25, 1999 1:20 pm 
Kris KennawayOct 25, 1999 1:29 pm 
Jim BryantOct 25, 1999 2:12 pm 
Ben RosengartOct 25, 1999 2:30 pm 
Jim BryantOct 25, 1999 4:05 pm 
Ben RosengartOct 26, 1999 8:29 am 
Matthew DillonOct 26, 1999 12:38 pm 
Jos BackusOct 26, 1999 2:52 pm 
Jim BryantOct 26, 1999 4:26 pm 
Matthew DillonOct 26, 1999 8:03 pm 
Jos BackusOct 27, 1999 1:43 pm 
Subject:Re: trek73
From:Ben Rosengart (be@skunk.org)
Date:Oct 25, 1999 2:30:18 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

You're talking as if litigious corporations follow logic and common sense. This is more the exception than the rule IMO.

Don't construe this as arguing against the inclusion of trek73 ... I think you're probably right that the risk is minimal, but for different reasons.

-- Ben Rosengart

UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message