|Sedukhin, Igor S||Mar 25, 2004 1:28 pm|
|Murray, Bryan P.||Mar 25, 2004 3:00 pm|
|Vambenepe, William N||Mar 25, 2004 5:16 pm|
|Fred Carter||Mar 25, 2004 5:55 pm|
|Sedukhin, Igor S||Mar 25, 2004 5:59 pm|
|Ed Day||Mar 26, 2004 5:49 am|
|Fred Carter||Mar 26, 2004 10:42 am|
|Sedukhin, Igor S||Mar 26, 2004 2:23 pm|
|Fred Carter||Mar 26, 2004 4:05 pm|
|Subject:||Re: [wsdm] FW: Request for Permanent URL|
|From:||Fred Carter (fred...@amberpoint.com)|
|Date:||Mar 25, 2004 5:55:34 pm|
I think (hope) I'm misunderstanding something. It seems to me to be much preferable of schemas & wsdl's are appropriately named. Thus, I would assume that, say, the mows 0.5 schema would be something like
I think that having dots (".") in directory names can be problematic, though I'm flexible on this. But I would *MUCH* prefer that the schema's & wsdl be named with that of which they are the schema or wsdl respectively, rather than just called schema (or wsdl).
This is valuable for a number of reasons. The most important of which is probably for folks who sometimes "work disconnected" (in the laptop sense :-) ) -- for these situations, they probably have some directory into which they stuff all these files & use a schemaLocation directive to work. if there are two files named wsdl, life gets confusing.
Thus, my preference would be the following
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/mows-05/mows.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/mows-05/mows.wsdl and http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/muws-05/muws.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/muws-05/muws.wsdl
or something like that. If we want to put the 05 in the names, that's OK, though I think it's somewhat redundant with the 2004/04 part.
I don't think I care much about the specifications -- indeed, they can sit at the committee site as per usual. It's the machine consumable parts that we'd like to fix in space.
Thus quoth Vambenepe, William N (~ 25-Mar-04 5:32 PM ~)...
Corrections in red (2 places).
-----Original Message----- *From:* Sedukhin, Igor S [mailto:Igor...@ca.com] *Sent:* Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:44 PM *To:* Wins...@Dell.com; ws...@lists.oasis-open.org *Subject:* RE: [wsdm] FW: Request for Permanent URL
Great, so the URLs that we will need are (just to reconfirm with everybody).
*http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/muws-0.5* - resolves to the M*U*WS spec *http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/muws-0.5/schema* *http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/mows-0.5/schema* *http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/m**o**ws-0.5* <http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/mows-0.5> - resolves to the MOWS spec *http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/muws-0.5/wsdl* *http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/04/mows-0.5/wsdl*
--* **Igor Sedukhin* .. (igor...@ca.com) --* (631) 342-4325* .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Wins...@Dell.com [mailto:Wins...@Dell.com] *Sent:* Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:35 PM *To:* ws...@lists.oasis-open.org *Subject:* [wsdm] FW: Request for Permanent URL
Here is the URL.
Igor, Heather, ....
Please send the files to me and I will get it posted.
Here is what the path will be named for you:
Please send me the files that you want uploaded including the directories and sub-directories and I'll upload them for you.
Sharon Burbine, Webmaster, OASIS
The Web Services Distributed Management (WSDM) TC would like to a request a permanent URL for posting WSDL, XSD and our specifications. This is in preparation for our interoperability testing event. We will need to be able to create sub directories and be able to post updates to these directories.
If you have any questions please let us know.
Thanks for your help, Winston Bumpus Co-chair of WSDM-TC
-- Fred Carter / AmberPoint, Inc.
mailto:fred...@amberpoint.com tel:+1.510.433.6525 fax:+1.510.663.6301