20 messages in com.googlegroups.pylons-discussRe: Trouble with Routes
FromSent OnAttachments
Dan Korostelev24 Aug 2007 01:38 
Marcin Kasperski24 Aug 2007 02:49 
Dan Korostelev24 Aug 2007 02:56 
Ben Bangert25 Aug 2007 09:42 
Marcin Kasperski27 Aug 2007 02:27 
Ben Bangert27 Aug 2007 08:35 
Marcin Kasperski27 Aug 2007 09:20 
Ben Bangert27 Aug 2007 10:00 
Neil Blakey-Milner27 Aug 2007 10:42 
Ben Bangert29 Aug 2007 10:11 
Marcin Kasperski30 Aug 2007 03:44 
Jose Galvez30 Aug 2007 18:07 
Ben Bangert30 Aug 2007 18:13 
Jose Galvez30 Aug 2007 20:07 
Ben Bangert31 Aug 2007 09:00 
Jose Galvez31 Aug 2007 13:02 
Ben Bangert31 Aug 2007 13:31 
Jose Galvez31 Aug 2007 14:25 
Ben Bangert31 Aug 2007 15:13 
Jose Galvez31 Aug 2007 16:43 
Subject:Re: Trouble with Routes
From:Jose Galvez (jj.g@public.gmane.org)
Date:08/30/2007 06:07:28 PM
List:com.googlegroups.pylons-discuss

Ben I took a look at your link and I'm confused. When you say "*Routes recognition and generation will always be explicit* " does this mean that the mapper mapper(':controller/:action/:id' action='index') will not match /main as /main/index Jose

Ben Bangert wrote:

On Aug 28, 2007, at 2:00 AM, Marcin Kasperski wrote:

(after additional reconsideration)

I think that the - with respect to the current behaviour - whole term 'named route' and mapper syntax is misleading.

Indeed, in Routes 2.0 the behavior you expect will be the default, I blogged more about other Routes 2.0 and 1.X features: http://groovie.org/articles/2007/08/29/routes-planning-and-the-road-to-routes-2-0

Cheers, Ben