atom feed16 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archCurious about SCM choice
FromSent OnAttachments
Milo HysonJun 27, 2008 3:05 am 
Doug BartonJun 27, 2008 5:55 am 
John BaldwinJun 27, 2008 6:15 am 
Milo HysonJun 27, 2008 7:12 am 
Dag-Erling SmørgravJun 27, 2008 3:46 pm 
Gordon TetlowJun 27, 2008 6:03 pm 
Milo HysonJun 28, 2008 1:26 am 
Henrik Brix AndersenJun 28, 2008 7:53 am 
Henrik Brix AndersenJun 28, 2008 7:53 am 
Robert WatsonJun 28, 2008 8:05 am 
Dag-Erling SmørgravJun 28, 2008 4:11 pm 
Richard ColemanJun 29, 2008 3:55 am 
M. Warner LoshJun 29, 2008 5:53 am 
Adrian ChaddJun 29, 2008 7:46 am 
Gordon TetlowJun 30, 2008 4:49 am 
Dag-Erling SmørgravJun 30, 2008 7:42 am 
Subject:Curious about SCM choice
From:Henrik Brix Andersen (br@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Jun 28, 2008 7:53:23 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:26:54PM -0700, Milo Hyson wrote:

Can not the "decentralized" systems like Mercurial and GIT be used in a centralized fashion? Our internal experiments certainly show them to be every bit as capable as Subversion in this regard. Has your experience been different?

They _can_ be used in centralized fashion, but they do not enforce it. Subversion enforces a centralized development model.

Brix

-- Henrik Brix Andersen <br@FreeBSD.org>