14 messages in com.googlegroups.bloggerdevRe: [bloggerDev] Re: all posts, again| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Ellis | 30 Jun 2006 19:21 | |
| Eric Case | 01 Jul 2006 11:11 | |
| logh...@gmail.com | 14 Jul 2006 09:53 | |
| Bill Lazar | 14 Jul 2006 10:40 | |
| phop...@google.com | 14 Jul 2006 12:57 | |
| Bill Lazar | 14 Jul 2006 13:10 | |
| phop...@google.com | 14 Jul 2006 14:01 | |
| Bill Lazar | 14 Jul 2006 14:06 | |
| Steve Jenson | 14 Jul 2006 14:46 | |
| Bill Lazar | 14 Jul 2006 15:03 | |
| Steve Jenson | 14 Jul 2006 15:30 | |
| Bill Lazar | 14 Jul 2006 15:43 | |
| Toru Marumoto | 14 Jul 2006 18:12 | |
| Toru Marumoto | 14 Jul 2006 18:37 |
| Subject: | Re: [bloggerDev] Re: all posts, again |
|---|---|
| From: | Steve Jenson (sjen...@google.com) |
| Date: | 07/14/2006 03:30:57 PM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.bloggerdev |
That argument seems like a non-sequitur to me. There is also atom:rights but does that mean we have to implement rights management? Clearly not. How about atom:subtitle? atom:contributor? Person:uri or Person:email? There are optional elements because not every tool is going to support them.
But consider your wish for categories to be duly noted.
Best, Steve
On 7/14/06, Bill Lazar <b....@billsaysthis.com> wrote:
Steve,
Optional to submit but one would expect that's a client-side decision and any complying server (in an Atom Store sense) would need to accept and use as expected. We could ping Sam Ruby about it, he's certainly as much of an impartial expert as I can think of.
To me this is an important issue because, for starters, users have been asking for category support since before I (briefly) worked with you at Pyra in 2002 and nearly every other blogging software supports them by now. Heck, even the Google Data APIs Overview page claims this that "GData is a new protocol based on Atom 1.0" and the first example of using it is for blogging.
Bill
-----Original Message----- From: blog...@googlegroups.com [mailto:blog...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jenson Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:47 PM To: blog...@googlegroups.com Subject: [bloggerDev] Re: all posts, again
Hi Bill,
According to the relax-ng schema, category is optional. I don't think it should signal an error if you send us a category but I haven't tried it.
Steve
On 7/14/06, Bill Lazar <b....@billsaysthis.com> wrote:
How will GData be Atom 1.0 compliant if this is the case?
-----Original Message----- From: blog...@googlegroups.com [mailto:blog...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of phop...@google.com Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:02 PM To: bloggerDev Subject: [bloggerDev] Re: all posts, again
The <category> element will be ignored (or possibly result in an error). In any event, we won't do anything useful with it, since Blogger does not support categories/labels/tags.
-- Pete