19 messages in org.apache.jackrabbit.devRe: Content Object Mapping - jcrom.org
FromSent OnAttachments
David Nuescheler05 Feb 2008 03:47 
Alexandru Popescu ☀05 Feb 2008 04:11 
Jukka Zitting05 Feb 2008 04:16 
Christophe Lombart05 Feb 2008 04:43 
Alex Lukin05 Feb 2008 04:47 
David Nuescheler05 Feb 2008 04:53 
IvanLatysh05 Feb 2008 06:40 
Alexandru Popescu ☀05 Feb 2008 09:20 
Alexandru Popescu ☀05 Feb 2008 09:23 
Alex Lukin05 Feb 2008 10:25 
Christophe Lombart05 Feb 2008 10:53 
Jukka Zitting05 Feb 2008 11:37 
Padraic Hannon05 Feb 2008 11:59 
Alex Lukin05 Feb 2008 12:05 
Christophe Lombart05 Feb 2008 12:49 
Alex Lukin05 Feb 2008 13:01 
Alexander Klimetschek06 Feb 2008 10:54 
ogg16 May 2008 04:06 
Jukka Zitting16 May 2008 05:09 
Subject:Re: Content Object Mapping - jcrom.org
From:Alex Lukin (luk@stu.cn.ua)
Date:02/05/2008 12:05:56 PM
List:org.apache.jackrabbit.dev

Tuesday 05 February 2008 20:53:46 Christophe Lombart написав: [skip]

Alex,

Jackrabbit OCM is also supporting the annotation like JCROM since a long time. XML support is not mandatory.

Christophe, I know because I already use it. It works somehow for me and I prefer official
things even when other project looks slightly better. I speak about "hanging ends" like:

1) namespace registration, additional node types registration etc that ought to
be hidden from me somewhere inside of OCM init code. 2) lack of "easy quick start" example. That one on the web is just misleading
and it's much better to replace it with just one line: "Dig into spources, don't bother reading docs!" Cutting example from tests is
not trivial because of 1)

Concerning JPA, we can make a small study to check if JPA is really a good solution for a JCR backend ... if someone have time :-)

Pease do it after examples and docs :) BTW, writing examples makes one to finally understand what a beast was created
and how to eat it right way! :)