14 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: Unknown User = EX...
FromSent OnAttachments
Griffiths, JonJul 24, 2001 7:28 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 24, 2001 2:56 pm 
Daniel RoesenJul 24, 2001 4:21 pm 
Oliver BlasnikJul 25, 2001 12:44 am 
Griffiths, JonJul 25, 2001 2:33 am 
Griffiths, JonJul 25, 2001 2:56 am 
Daniel RoesenJul 25, 2001 3:30 am 
Xavier BeaudouinJul 25, 2001 3:41 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 25, 2001 4:46 am 
Oliver BlasnikJul 25, 2001 7:30 am 
Daniel RoesenJul 25, 2001 8:29 am 
Griffiths, JonJul 25, 2001 10:00 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 25, 2001 2:15 pm 
Oliver BlasnikJul 25, 2001 2:58 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Re: Unknown User = EX_TEMPFAIL??Actions...
From:Daniel Roesen (dr@cluenet.de)
Date:Jul 24, 2001 4:21:45 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:57:03PM +0000, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

If this is a nonexistent mailbox, the mail server should refuse to accept the message, and return it as undeliverable, and maildrop should not even be run.

The problem is with virtual users, where only Courier-IMAP knows which users exist and which not. Coupling Courier-IMAP with non-native MTAs requires more or less beautiful "hacks" to make the users known to the MTA.

What do you think about an option for Courier-IMAP to make unknown user a temporary failure? There are people out there who _can_ make this concious decision. :-) This problem pops up every few days/weeks here on the list...

Best regards, Daniel