atom feed46 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-appsRe: [docbook-apps] Simpler XHTML output
FromSent OnAttachments
Rene HacheApr 21, 2005 7:01 pm 
Larry GarfieldApr 21, 2005 11:46 pm 
Bob StaytonApr 21, 2005 11:57 pm 
Larry GarfieldApr 22, 2005 12:16 am 
Rene HacheApr 22, 2005 8:15 am 
Dave PawsonApr 22, 2005 10:26 am 
Rene HacheApr 22, 2005 11:28 am 
Bob StaytonApr 22, 2005 12:31 pm 
Rene HacheApr 25, 2005 8:33 am 
Jirka KosekApr 25, 2005 8:42 am.bin
Justus PiaterApr 25, 2005 9:30 am 
Dave PawsonApr 25, 2005 9:40 am 
Rene HacheApr 25, 2005 9:54 am 
Jirka KosekApr 25, 2005 9:55 am.bin
Dave PawsonApr 25, 2005 9:58 am 
Jirka KosekApr 25, 2005 10:08 am.bin
Dave PawsonApr 25, 2005 10:25 am 
Bob StaytonApr 25, 2005 10:40 am 
Dave PawsonApr 25, 2005 10:46 am 
Rene HacheApr 25, 2005 2:19 pm 
Rene HacheApr 25, 2005 2:22 pm 
Larry GarfieldApr 25, 2005 5:24 pm 
Larry GarfieldApr 25, 2005 5:28 pm 
Chris JohnsonApr 25, 2005 5:49 pm 
Bob StaytonApr 25, 2005 5:52 pm 
Rene HacheApr 25, 2005 6:35 pm 
Larry GarfieldApr 26, 2005 6:14 am 
Justus PiaterApr 26, 2005 6:58 am 
Rene HacheApr 26, 2005 7:06 am 
Justus PiaterApr 26, 2005 7:08 am 
Norman WalshApr 26, 2005 8:35 am.pgp
Colin Paul AdamsApr 26, 2005 8:44 am 
Dave PawsonApr 26, 2005 8:47 am 
Dave PawsonApr 26, 2005 8:48 am 
Norman WalshApr 26, 2005 8:52 am.pgp
John L. ClarkApr 26, 2005 1:52 pm.pgp
Peter RingApr 27, 2005 2:31 am 
Rene HacheApr 28, 2005 9:16 pm 
Dave PawsonApr 29, 2005 11:45 am 
Larry GarfieldApr 29, 2005 10:04 pm 
Rene HacheApr 30, 2005 12:25 am 
M.-A. DARCHEApr 30, 2005 8:27 am 
Larry GarfieldMay 2, 2005 9:04 pm 
Dave PawsonMay 3, 2005 10:10 am 
Rene HacheMay 3, 2005 11:47 am 
Larry GarfieldMay 4, 2005 10:41 pm 
Subject:Re: [docbook-apps] Simpler XHTML output
From:Dave Pawson (dav@dpawson.co.uk)
Date:Apr 25, 2005 9:58:00 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-apps

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 09:54 -0700, Rene Hache wrote:

Jirka,

I don't know enough about programming to respond to your concern over XHTML 1.1 so I don't see any problems going for XHTML 1.0. Any problems going with the "strict" recommendation, or should we stick with "transitional".

strict is 'simpler' than transitional. That would be an easier target.

5. The only DIV to be created inside the main content will be for admonitions, sidebar and highlights.

Why? That way you will not be able to control rendering of whole section or titlepage for example. Current stylesheets wrap these structures inside <div class="section"> or <div class="titlepage"> respectively.

From a web standards perspective, the only real reason to add DIVs is when you need separate content from the normal flow.

My view. Keep it simple, very simple. Omit all the class attributes, nested divisions, etc etc. I.e. all content is part of the normal flow.

For instance, with all due respect to developped the stylesheets, I don't understand the logic of using the <div class="titlepage"> or the <div class="section">.

If anything, controlling style and rendering gets increasingly confusing as you add DIVs. While I am certain that we will add DIVs as this process develops, for the moment I would rather strip all DIVs as a "guiding principle" unless there is an obvious need to separate the content from the flow.

Agree. The simpler the better.

regards DaveP.