| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Uribe | Sep 21, 2011 5:19 am | |
| Leonardo Uribe | Sep 21, 2011 5:20 am | |
| Michael Kurz | Sep 21, 2011 5:34 am | |
| Grant Smith | Sep 21, 2011 8:07 am | |
| Rudy De Busscher | Sep 21, 2011 8:14 am | |
| Gerhard Petracek | Sep 21, 2011 9:18 am | |
| Matt Benson | Sep 21, 2011 9:28 am | |
| Mark Struberg | Sep 21, 2011 10:47 am | |
| Mark Struberg | Sep 21, 2011 10:49 am | |
| Leonardo Uribe | Sep 21, 2011 11:11 am | |
| Leonardo Uribe | Sep 21, 2011 11:31 am | |
| Jakob Korherr | Sep 21, 2011 1:20 pm | |
| Grant Smith | Sep 21, 2011 1:42 pm | |
| Matt Benson | Sep 21, 2011 2:01 pm | |
| Mark Struberg | Sep 21, 2011 2:50 pm | |
| Bernd Bohmann | Sep 22, 2011 12:52 am | |
| Gerhard Petracek | Sep 22, 2011 12:58 am | |
| Martin Marinschek | Sep 22, 2011 1:17 am | |
| Jakob Korherr | Sep 22, 2011 3:15 am | |
| Michael Kurz | Sep 22, 2011 4:14 am | |
| Mark Struberg | Sep 22, 2011 4:17 am | |
| Michael Kurz | Sep 22, 2011 4:29 am | |
| Bernd Bohmann | Sep 22, 2011 5:15 am | |
| Michael Kurz | Sep 22, 2011 5:22 am | |
| Leonardo Uribe | Sep 22, 2011 7:10 am | |
| Grant Smith | Sep 22, 2011 7:59 am |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] fix MYFACES-2552 for 2.0.x and 2.1.x branches | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Matt Benson (gudn...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Sep 21, 2011 9:28:44 am | |
| List: | org.apache.myfaces.dev | |
+1
However, let's simplify the context parameter by giving it a name relating to JSF 2.2 compatibility. I submitted the final implementation for Mojarra, so have every right to add the same to MyFaces.
Matt
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Gerhard Petracek <gerh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for it in combination with the context parameter regards, gerhard
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/9/21 Rudy De Busscher <rdeb...@gmail.com>
+1 And if we create a context parameter, it should behave by default as in the JSF 2.2 Spec. If users want strict spec (2.0/2.1)behaviour they have to set the parameter value. regards Rudy On 21 September 2011 17:08, Grant Smith <work...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 if it's configurable in a <context-param>. How about org.apache.myfaces.EL_RESOLVER_GETTYPE_RETURNS_NULL ?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Michael Kurz <mich...@gmx.at> wrote:
+1
Am 21.09.2011 um 14:20 schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
+1
2011/9/21 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>:
Hi
More than a year ago, it was found that EL expressions like #{cc.attrs.test} does not resolve its type correctly, because the composite component EL resolver is not able to find the right type. Instead, MapELResolver always return Object.class as type, breaking composite components that use h:selectOneXXX into its internals. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2552
The problem with this issue is we need to change the way how org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.CompositeComponentELResolver works. JSF 2.0 spec clearly says in its section 5.6.2.2 that getType() for that EL resolver should return null.
The issue was reported to the EG and a fix was included in JSF 2.2. spec, see:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-745
but we still receive reports about the same issue (MYFACES-3311 and others (last comment on MYFACES-1890) ).
So, the current behavior even if is described by the spec is too inconvenient. Note we already have some places in our implementation that does not follow strictly the spec, to keep things working as users expect. To follow the protocol in these cases, we need an official community decision about include it in 2.0.x and 2.1.x branches. Please vote:
+1 if you want this fix included in 2.0.x and 2.1.x. +0 -1 and the reason why if you see this could cause any problem.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
-- Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
-- Rudy De Busscher http://www.c4j.be





