atom feed34 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversio...
FromSent OnAttachments
David WolfskillOct 20, 2011 4:48 am 
David WolfskillOct 20, 2011 5:20 am.diff
Steve KarglOct 20, 2011 7:33 am 
Michael ButlerOct 20, 2011 7:43 am 
Sergey V. DyatkoOct 20, 2011 11:01 pm 
Garrett CooperOct 20, 2011 11:49 pm 
John BaldwinOct 21, 2011 1:35 pm 
David WolfskillOct 21, 2011 2:11 pm 
Craig RodriguesOct 21, 2011 5:50 pm 
Doug BartonOct 21, 2011 6:11 pm 
Craig RodriguesOct 21, 2011 10:41 pm 
Doug BartonOct 21, 2011 10:47 pm 
Garrett CooperOct 22, 2011 8:29 am 
Olivier SmedtsOct 22, 2011 8:38 am 
Nali TojaOct 22, 2011 9:04 am 
Luchesar V. ILIEVOct 22, 2011 9:31 am 
Garrett CooperOct 22, 2011 11:02 am 
Doug BartonOct 22, 2011 11:11 am 
Boris SamorodovOct 22, 2011 12:06 pm 
Doug BartonOct 22, 2011 12:12 pm 
Garrett CooperOct 22, 2011 12:24 pm 
John BaldwinOct 24, 2011 4:59 am 
Luchesar V. ILIEVOct 24, 2011 6:55 am 
Craig RodriguesOct 24, 2011 10:14 am 
Doug BartonOct 24, 2011 2:48 pm 
David WolfskillOct 25, 2011 6:59 am 
Craig RodriguesOct 25, 2011 12:43 pm 
Doug BartonOct 25, 2011 1:07 pm.diff
Craig RodriguesOct 25, 2011 1:23 pm 
Doug BartonOct 25, 2011 1:53 pm 
Craig RodriguesOct 25, 2011 2:45 pm 
Doug BartonOct 25, 2011 4:03 pm 
Craig RodriguesOct 27, 2011 12:05 pm.diff, .txt, .txt
Doug BartonOct 27, 2011 1:45 pm 
Subject:Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7
From:Garrett Cooper (yane@gmail.com)
Date:Oct 22, 2011 12:24:18 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

On 10/22/2011 12:07, Boris Samorodov wrote:

22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет:

On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:

$(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')

2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running svnversion.

Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and more effective one already exists? :)

I'm not an exert here, so I'm not sure which one and why did you call "simple and more effective":

Please read the rest of this thread, where the fact that svnversion does more than what 'svn info' does, and that people find the more that it does to be useful.

So "simpler" is "one command, not 2 or more," and "more effective" is "provides more information, and people find that extra information useful." :)

I was just offering an alternative (improperly timed), and as dougb@ pointed
out, svnversion works better. Thanks, -Garrett_______________________________________________ free@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free@freebsd.org"