2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and
more effective one already exists? :)
I'm not an exert here, so I'm not sure which one and why did you call
"simple and more effective":
Please read the rest of this thread, where the fact that svnversion does
more than what 'svn info' does, and that people find the more that it
does to be useful.
So "simpler" is "one command, not 2 or more," and "more effective" is
"provides more information, and people find that extra information
I was just offering an alternative (improperly timed), and as dougb@ pointed out, svnversion works better.
free...@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free...@freebsd.org"