

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
10 messages in com.googlegroups.jquery-dev[jquery-dev] Re: Subclassing jQuery| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Nate Cavanaugh | Nov 11, 2008 3:37 pm | |
| John Resig | Nov 12, 2008 6:36 am | |
| Nate Cavanaugh | Nov 12, 2008 11:08 am | |
| John Resig | Nov 12, 2008 11:16 am | |
| Nate Cavanaugh | Nov 12, 2008 11:29 am | |
| John Resig | Nov 12, 2008 11:51 am | |
| Nate Cavanaugh | Nov 12, 2008 12:46 pm | |
| John Resig | Nov 12, 2008 1:19 pm | |
| Nate Cavanaugh | Nov 13, 2008 11:33 am | |
| John Resig | Nov 13, 2008 11:45 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [jquery-dev] Re: Subclassing jQuery | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Nate Cavanaugh (na...@shift22.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 12, 2008 11:08:31 am | |
| List: | com.googlegroups.jquery-dev | |
Heya John,
Thanks for the response, and sorry I wasn't more clear. I've tried so many different variations of this, that I can't remember which did what. That one does keep the chain properly in place, but this doesn't work:
subClass('body') // Should error out and say subClass.fn.init is not a constructor.
Every way I was able to get the above to work, it would only do so by maintaining the link between subClass.fn and jQuery.fn.
Is there any other way you can think of that would essentially (and in a way that's performant) extend a new object off the jQuery object?
Thanks again for your guys time :)
Nate Cavanaugh Director of User Interface Engineering Liferay, Inc. Enterprise. Open Source. For life.
On Nov 12, 2008, at 6:37 AM, John Resig wrote:
Try as I might I can't reproduce your problem. I created a test page: http://dev.jquery.com/~john/plugins/subclass/
I overwrote the removeClass method and they're both different on each object (subClass vs. jQuery).
Maybe there's another mistake at play?
--John
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Nate Cavanaugh <na...@shift22.com> wrote:
Hi all, As promised, here is the second topic I wanted to ask about: Are there any plans, or is there any current way to subclass the jQuery object? I've been doing a lot of digging around and I've seen some talks about it, and there have been some questions about what the use would be, but I've found a use case, and me, Paul, and Eduardo have all tried to figure out a way, but to no avail. Here is the use case: I want to create a function that behaves exactly like jQuery, except that it does some slightly different things, and be able to extend it without worrying about what the parent jQuery object is doing, or what plugins have been loaded globally. The benefits are that it would use the prototype chain, so it would be memory efficient, and it would be a way to add plugins without them being clobbered by other plugins. So, I've tried a bunch of stuff: var subClass = function(sel, context){ return new subClass.fn.init(sel, context); } subClass.fn = subClass.prototype = new jQuery.fn.init; subClass.fn.init = subClass.prototype; and I've tried so many different variations of this, but anytime I try to do: subClass.fn.test = function(){} it, without fail, creates jQuery.fn.test. To show what I am trying to do, I'll give an example: jQuery.fn.plugin1 = function(){ console.log('I am global, everyone can see me'); return this; } // globally available plugin subClass.fn.plugin1 = function(){ console.log('I am local, and I am only run when using the subclass'); return this; } // my own local plugin so you could do: jQuery('body').plugin1(); // prints 'I am global, everyone can see me' subClass('body').plugin1(); // prints 'I am local, and I am only run when using the subclass' However, namespaced plugins is only one advantage. Being able to attach custom static methods, etc, would be incredibly useful. Does anyone know of a way to subclass the jQuery object using it's prototype? Thanks again for reading all of this. I truly appreciate it, Nate Cavanaugh Director of User Interface Engineering Liferay, Inc. Enterprise. Open Source. For life.
Nate Cavanaugh Director of User Interface Engineering Liferay, Inc. Enterprise. Open Source. For life.
Nate Cavanaugh Director of User Interface Engineering Liferay, Inc. Enterprise. Open Source. For life.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jque...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsu...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---







