atom feed161 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] why using vanilla better...
FromSent OnAttachments
100 earlier messages
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:45 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:50 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:52 am 
Damian StewartFeb 19, 2009 12:53 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:55 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 1:00 am 
Matt BarberFeb 19, 2009 1:15 am 
cyrille henryFeb 19, 2009 2:07 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 19, 2009 6:04 am 
Martin PeachFeb 19, 2009 6:14 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 19, 2009 7:21 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:27 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 10:15 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 19, 2009 10:28 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 19, 2009 3:10 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 19, 2009 3:26 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:33 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:40 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:48 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 10:07 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 10:08 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 10:09 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 19, 2009 11:06 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 20, 2009 12:48 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 20, 2009 12:59 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 20, 2009 1:21 am 
João PaisFeb 20, 2009 2:10 am.xls
Claude Heiland-AllenFeb 20, 2009 6:23 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 20, 2009 7:18 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 22, 2009 2:53 am 
João PaisFeb 22, 2009 2:57 pm 
João PaisFeb 22, 2009 3:11 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 22, 2009 3:43 pm 
cyrille henryFeb 22, 2009 4:49 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 22, 2009 5:32 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 22, 2009 6:09 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 22, 2009 8:50 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 22, 2009 9:02 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 23, 2009 12:34 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 23, 2009 1:03 am 
cyrille henryFeb 23, 2009 2:53 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 23, 2009 3:21 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 23, 2009 3:37 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 23, 2009 3:58 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 23, 2009 5:04 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 23, 2009 5:19 am 
cyrille henryFeb 23, 2009 9:27 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 23, 2009 9:48 am 
Loic KessousFeb 23, 2009 11:33 am 
João PaisFeb 23, 2009 12:52 pm 
João PaisFeb 23, 2009 1:10 pm 
cyrille henryFeb 23, 2009 3:16 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 23, 2009 4:07 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 23, 2009 4:14 pm 
Loic KessousFeb 24, 2009 4:06 am 
cyrille henryFeb 24, 2009 8:48 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 24, 2009 5:05 pm 
cyrille henryFeb 25, 2009 2:00 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 25, 2009 7:29 am 
cyrille henryFeb 25, 2009 10:22 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 25, 2009 11:37 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] why using vanilla better than extended; was :Re: pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]
From:João Pais (jmmm@googlemail.com)
Date:Feb 23, 2009 12:52:47 pm
List:at.iem.pd-dev

that's true, after making the question I thought that mainly the most hardcore guys stick to pd-van, because it's easier for them to adapt it to their needs, and there's more tradition with self-programming (enhancing the core package). but I would dare say that for many non-developper-users, pd-ext is much more used than pd-van. pd-ext is a couple of decimals behind pd-van (and the windows version even more, as the disk for it is out of order since last summer), but HC doesn't have a grant to work on pd-ext.

yep, when you need to compile some stuff, pd-extended is not really made for you. since i quite often have to use a very recent Gem version for my project, (specially when i correct some Gem bugs when working on this project), i must recompile Gem on the target machine, so using extended is not really easy. using extended is ok when installing a project i made about 1 year ago...