atom feed77 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: Releases
FromSent OnAttachments
Hays, SamApr 9, 2001 6:32 am 
James RafteryApr 9, 2001 6:45 am 
Steve TremblettApr 9, 2001 6:57 am 
RasputinApr 9, 2001 7:47 am 
Matthew EmmertonApr 9, 2001 8:06 am 
Christopher SchulteApr 9, 2001 8:26 am 
RasputinApr 9, 2001 8:28 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 8:45 am 
Christopher SchulteApr 9, 2001 9:23 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 9, 2001 10:25 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:29 am 
Markus HolmbergApr 9, 2001 10:35 am 
Michael R. RudelApr 9, 2001 10:37 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:38 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:49 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 9, 2001 10:52 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:56 am 
David A. KoranApr 9, 2001 11:15 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 9, 2001 11:15 am 
Przemyslaw BrojewskiApr 9, 2001 11:15 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 11:31 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 11:36 am 
Przemyslaw BrojewskiApr 9, 2001 11:58 am 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 9, 2001 12:10 pm 
Ken BolingbrokeApr 9, 2001 12:13 pm 
Kal TorakApr 9, 2001 12:34 pm 
Matthew EmmertonApr 9, 2001 12:54 pm 
Jeffrey J. MountinApr 9, 2001 12:54 pm 
Scott DodsonApr 9, 2001 1:15 pm 
Jeff LoveApr 9, 2001 1:28 pm 
David KellyApr 9, 2001 1:42 pm 
Peter RadcliffeApr 9, 2001 1:43 pm 
Ben LoyallApr 9, 2001 2:07 pm 
James PenickApr 9, 2001 2:08 pm 
Juha SaarinenApr 9, 2001 2:20 pm 
Mike MeyerApr 9, 2001 3:54 pm 
Bob KApr 9, 2001 4:22 pm 
Conrad SabatierApr 9, 2001 5:49 pm 
Christopher K DavisApr 9, 2001 5:54 pm 
Matthew EmmertonApr 9, 2001 7:03 pm 
Donn MillerApr 9, 2001 7:12 pm 
Jeffrey J. MountinApr 9, 2001 10:53 pm.Other
Nik ClaytonApr 10, 2001 4:06 am 
Nik ClaytonApr 10, 2001 4:12 am 
Nik ClaytonApr 10, 2001 4:19 am 
Mike MeyerApr 10, 2001 5:51 am 
Steve TremblettApr 10, 2001 6:36 am 
GraywaneApr 10, 2001 6:53 am 
Michael NottebrockApr 10, 2001 8:32 am 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 10, 2001 8:34 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 10, 2001 8:41 am 
Gerhard SittigApr 10, 2001 9:51 am 
Dan LangilleApr 10, 2001 12:33 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 10, 2001 1:52 pm 
Joe AbleyApr 10, 2001 2:28 pm 
Mike MeyerApr 10, 2001 2:46 pm 
David O'BrienApr 10, 2001 2:47 pm 
Dan LangilleApr 10, 2001 2:54 pm 
David O'BrienApr 10, 2001 2:54 pm 
Mike MeyerApr 10, 2001 2:55 pm 
David O'BrienApr 10, 2001 2:56 pm 
Juha SaarinenApr 10, 2001 3:28 pm 
Matthew EmmertonApr 10, 2001 5:28 pm 
Dima DorfmanApr 10, 2001 9:30 pm 
Peter JeremyApr 10, 2001 10:30 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 10, 2001 10:48 pm 
Steve O'Hara-SmithApr 10, 2001 11:00 pm 
Oliver FrommeApr 11, 2001 6:45 am 
David O'BrienApr 11, 2001 10:14 am 
jonathan michaelsApr 11, 2001 12:26 pm 
Oliver FrommeApr 11, 2001 12:48 pm 
Pete FrenchApr 11, 2001 12:58 pm 
Michael ButlerApr 11, 2001 1:13 pm 
jonathan michaelsApr 11, 2001 1:20 pm 
Nik ClaytonApr 11, 2001 2:51 pm 
Dan LangilleApr 11, 2001 3:19 pm 
Nik ClaytonApr 12, 2001 12:57 am 
Subject:Re: Releases
From:Christopher Schulte (chri@schulte.org)
Date:Apr 9, 2001 8:26:28 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

At 11:06 AM 4/9/2001 -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:

[ On a related note, -CURRENT seems to suggest the wrong thing. I've had the unlucky experience of recovering production boxes (!!) that previous admins had decided to update to -CURRENT because, hey, it must be the best code, right? IMHO, -CURRENT should be -DEV. That's a pretty clear indication that it shouldn't be run on production boxes. ]

Change the designation just because some admins don't know how to RTFM? I don't think so... They fu*ked up. Plain and simple. -CURRENT makes sense, and more importantly is documented for those who take the time to look.

I'm not as hot about the BETA designation, but generally feel it should be left alone simply because it's documented, and thus should NOT be a problem. *sigh* My position may change on this topic.

--chris

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message