Dave,

No, no worries :-) It's just about whether they should be separate entities in
the model or not (at least that's what I understand :-S) Currently they're not
even roles in the spec are they? They are simply attributes in the Symptoms and
that's it. So the question is: do we want to put them in a more central role (if
there is justification) or just leave them as they are?

Cheers,

Stavros

From: David Snelling [mailto:Davi...@UK.Fujitsu.com] Sent: 22 June 2010 12:50 To: Stavros Isaiadis Cc: sa...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [saf] Model and Interfaces document

Folks,

Just want to check on one thing here.

Surely you are not suggesting removing the reporter and Subject from the Symptom
itself are you? I believe it is an essential component on the Symptom model.

If however if you are just talking about removing it from the list of roles, I
less worried. Just seeking clarification.

Thanks.

On 22 Jun 2010, at 09:53,
Stav...@uk.fujitsu.com<mailto:Stav...@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote:

Hi all,

Jeff you were quicker than me :-) I had already modified the model and
interfaces document, but your comments gave me some food for thought.

is this a rework of the existing section(s) in the main Spec WD? Do we plan to
incorporate this into the main Spec WD?

I think we decided to add any more concrete interface discussion as an appendix
to the spec, and keep the operations and interfaces discussion in the spec a bit
abstract. I will see into putting everything together and modifying the spec
this week.

What do the different colors represent?

The colored diagram I provided is a bit outdated and comes from an ontology
editor, so not the best visualization for our purposes :-)

Subject/Reporter convolutes the Spec (in my opinion) w/o adding significant
benefit. I could see moving Symptom.confidence to Reporter, and possibly adding
other attributes that could be leveraged by the Diagnostician - but would prefer
to leave that as implementation specific.

Perhaps subject and reporter do not need to be included in such model, as you
say because we haven't figured out why would anyone need them there (yet). To be
discussed.

Also, the whole roles section will probably be removed if we merge with the main
spec. I will send out another email with some proposed changes to the spec (to
keep thing clean for the list).

The REST section is being put to test constantly here at FLE :-) So it will
change continuously! More to come...

Cheers,

Stavros

-- Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe

______________________________________________________________________

Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited

Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE

Registered No. 4153469

This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and

may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised

use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this

e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that

it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.

Take care:

Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com > Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited Hayes Park Central Hayes End Road Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE Reg. No. 4153469

+44-7590-293439 (Mobile)

Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE Registered No. 4153469