On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:26:47AM +0900, Edward Middleton wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
Brice Figureau wrote:
Will you merge the CRL one (feel free to rewrite it if you prefer), too ?
Yes, the single issue is name of directive: ssl_crl. Should it be longer and
more expressive ? Apache has SSLCARevocationFile.
I think the original argument is better. Anyone who uses a CRL is
going to know what it is. If you call the command something else they
have to search the manual to find out what you have chosen to called
it. In my opinion it would be better to call it ssl_crl_file so that it
is obvious it expects a file path.
It's seems you are right. CRL became well known abbreviation as SSL itself.