atom feed48 messages in net.java.dev.jugs.jug-leaders[jug-leaders] Re: That's bad for JavaFx
FromSent OnAttachments
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 6, 2012 7:48 am 
Tobias FrechAug 6, 2012 8:28 am 
Marcos EliziarioAug 6, 2012 8:32 am 
Frank GrecoAug 6, 2012 8:37 am 
Marcos EliziarioAug 6, 2012 8:53 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 6, 2012 8:54 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 6, 2012 8:57 am 
John YearyAug 7, 2012 4:54 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 7, 2012 5:26 am 
Donald SmithAug 7, 2012 5:46 pm 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 8, 2012 12:28 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 12:37 am.png
Baptiste MATHUSAug 16, 2012 12:52 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 8:10 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 8:12 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 8:13 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 8:33 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 9:16 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:37 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:41 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 9:42 am 
Frank GrecoAug 16, 2012 9:45 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:53 am 
Bruno F. SouzaAug 16, 2012 9:58 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 10:25 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 10:26 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 10:46 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 1:06 pm 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 7:35 pm 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 9:49 pm 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:55 pm 
Baptiste MATHUSAug 16, 2012 10:06 pm 
Manfred MoserAug 16, 2012 10:39 pm 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 17, 2012 12:14 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 12:35 am 
Donald SmithAug 17, 2012 7:02 am 
Martijn VerburgAug 17, 2012 7:08 am 
Peter Van de VoordeAug 17, 2012 7:11 am 
John YearyAug 17, 2012 7:30 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 17, 2012 7:41 am 
Joe Sam ShirahAug 17, 2012 7:59 am 
Milton SmithAug 17, 2012 9:08 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 9:29 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 9:42 am 
Tobias FrechAug 17, 2012 9:50 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 9:55 am 
John YearyAug 17, 2012 10:00 am 
Milton SmithAug 17, 2012 10:12 am 
Subject:[jug-leaders] Re: That's bad for JavaFx
From:John Yeary (john@gmail.com)
Date:Aug 7, 2012 4:54:11 am
List:net.java.dev.jugs.jug-leaders

That article is pure FUD and does not contribute to anything except to point out people should keep their software up to date.

____________________________

John Yeary

____________________________ *NetBeans Dream Team* *President Greenville Java Users Group Java Users Groups Community Leader Java Enterprise Community Leader*

____________________________

<http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com/> <https://twitter.com/jyeary> <http://www.youtube.com/johnyeary> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jyeary> <https://plus.google.com/112146428878473069965> <http://www.facebook.com/jyeary> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/JavaEvangelistJohnYearysBlog> <http://netbeans.org/people/84414-jyeary>

"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -- Theodore Roosevelt

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hildeberto Mendonça <me@hildeberto.com>wrote:

It's really easy for Microsoft to update .Net/Windows platform. In case of security holes, they can enforce a security update very fast. JRE still cannot do that so well.

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Frank Greco <fgr@javasig.com> wrote:

Java presents a security issue and .NET/Windows doesn't?

Its the usual FUD from the quickly sinking Microsoft ship. Its a poorly written article. Just ignore it.

Frank G

On 8/6/12 10:49 AM, Hildeberto Mendonça wrote:

That's really bad for JavaFX! :-( I would love to use this technology, but this kind of thing is pushing me out :-( Really sad.

http://www.infoworld.com/t/**java-programming/microsoft-** hits-java-where-it-hurts-**198936<http://www.infoworld.com/t/java-programming/microsoft-hits-java-where-it-hurts-198936>

-- Hildeberto Mendonça, Ph.D Blog: http://www.hildeberto.com Community: http://www.cejug.org

-- Hildeberto Mendonça, Ph.D Blog: http://www.hildeberto.com Community: http://www.cejug.org