atom feed9 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.spectoolsRe: [spectools] IPR statements and OA...
FromSent OnAttachments
Eve L. MalerApr 30, 2002 3:58 pm 
Karl F. BestMay 1, 2002 6:34 am 
Eduardo GutentagMay 1, 2002 3:34 pm 
dcpl...@ftnetwork.comMay 2, 2002 12:36 am 
Karl F. BestMay 2, 2002 5:19 am 
Karl F. BestMay 2, 2002 5:41 am 
dcpl...@ftnetwork.comMay 2, 2002 9:37 am 
dcpl...@ftnetwork.comMay 2, 2002 9:42 am 
Norman WalshMay 28, 2002 12:40 pm 
Subject:Re: [spectools] IPR statements and OASIS specs
From:Norman Walsh (nd@nwalsh.com)
Date:May 28, 2002 12:40:05 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.spectools

/ Eduardo Gutentag <edua@sun.com> was heard to say: [...] | "For information on wether any patents have been disclosed that may be | essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent | licensing terms, please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section | of the xxxTC web page (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xxxTC)" | | This boilerplate would of course be mandatory, not optional.

I updated the DocBook template accordingly and republished.

Be seeing you, norm