9 messages in org.apache.jakarta.slide-devRe: proposal to move JCR RI to incubator
FromSent OnAttachments
Roy T. FieldingAug 3, 2004 5:29 pm 
Gianugo RabellinoAug 4, 2004 1:14 am 
Daniel FloreyAug 4, 2004 1:51 am 
Daniel FloreyAug 4, 2004 1:58 am 
Mats NorénAug 4, 2004 4:22 am 
Stefan GuggisbergAug 4, 2004 6:13 am 
David NueschelerAug 5, 2004 3:01 am 
Paul RussellAug 5, 2004 4:06 am 
Andrew SavoryAug 6, 2004 3:42 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: proposal to move JCR RI to incubatorActions...
From:Paul Russell (wo@paulrussell.org)
Date:Aug 5, 2004 4:06:34 am
List:org.apache.jakarta.slide-dev

Hi all,

On 5 Aug 2004, at 11:01, David Nuescheler wrote:

Hi Gianugo, [...]

As a consequence, then, my first proposal would be rethink the name: jcr or jcrri aren't "product" names, and they smell bad of "just" RI (a quick "grep '.*j.*c.*r.*' /usr/share/dict/words" didn't blow my mind, the best alternative being "rejoicer".

.. or JuiCeR ;)) ?

Urgh. ;)

Count me in, I'd be glad to help out in my Copious Free Time (urgh).

Thanks.

I hate saying 'me too', but I'm also totally behind the JCR RI being separated out, both to increase its visibility, and to emphasise that JCR is not 'just another API for slide'.

I am more than happy to help in any way I can. To me, JCR could be a fundamental part of a number of large projects, so it's extremely important that we prove the technology and build a world-class implementation as soon as practical.

Count me in.

Paul -- Paul Russell wo@paulrussell.org