| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ubl-dev] UBL-Order and Freight Instructions | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Michael Strasser (Mich...@brisbane.qld.gov.au) | |
| Date: | Mar 25, 2008 4:16:37 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.ubl-dev | |
Refine Search
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Strasser | Mar 2, 2008 10:50 pm | |
| Fulton Wilcox | Mar 3, 2008 8:55 am | |
| Michael Strasser | Mar 25, 2008 4:16 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [ubl-dev] UBL-Order and Freight Instructions | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Michael Strasser (Mich...@brisbane.qld.gov.au) | |
| Date: | Mar 25, 2008 4:16:37 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.ubl-dev | |
It turns out that the source system puts strings such as "FREE INTO STORE" (i.e. don't charge for freight) in the Freight Instructions field.
We decided to use /ord:Order/cac:TransactionConditions/cbc:Description to hold that information.
Regards
Michael Strasser Brisbane, Australia
"Michael Strasser" <Mich...@brisbane.qld.gov.au> 3/03/2008 16:50
I am getting close to modelling our documents using UBL schemas and extensions kindly provided by Stephen Green.
Our faxed Purchase Order includes a multi-line field called Freight Instructions. I am seeking clarification from the business what they mean by this.
From my looking at it, the best UBL analogue appears to be /ord:Order/cac:Delivery/cac:Despatch and its components. But if the business wants the ability to write free-form instructions there appears to be no place for that. I thought of using /ord:Order/cbc:Note but it is already earmarked for general information relating to the order as a whole.
Have I missed something obvious?
Thanks in advance
Michael Strasser Brisbane, Australia
**********************************************************************
This message has passed through an insecure network.
Please direct all enquiries to the message author.
**********************************************************************

